2018-11-07

Academic Consensus and Jesus Mythicism

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

I know many readers will be interested in the following.

R. G. Price (whose book I recently wrote about) has posted thoughts on the relationship between academic consensus and the question of the historicity of Jesus: Academic consensus is important, but it’s not always right.

His discussion segues into another related page, On the Origin of Jesus by Means of Mythical Propagation.

 

Related Posts on Vridar

Comments + I just noticed some queries about formatting in comments and have updated that page by adding the following:  And for bullet points:    (Tim, ...
Comments Hi all. I have neglected checking the comments for a few days and am trying to catch up now. If there is anything I have missed that you might have wa...
The Abomination of Desolation in Mark 13: What Did... "Today, we know only too well the experiences of refugee treks, what such an escape can look like." Yazidis of Iraq fleeing to the mountains. ...
A Pre-Christian Suffering Messiah Idea: Concluding... For a discussion of the old view of Israelite Kingship and comparison with today's understanding: Clines, David. 1975. “The Psalms and the King.” Th...
The following two tabs change content below.

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

2 Comments

  • Jonathan Rutherford
    2018-11-08 00:54:06 UTC - 00:54 | Permalink

    R.G Price is work is great I reckon. That latest piece is a terrific summary of the best case for mythicism. I reccomend his work to people, especially his analysis of Mark, which really gets to the heart of the purpose of the gospel.

  • 2018-11-09 00:31:29 UTC - 00:31 | Permalink

    Thanks for the support.

    One funny note. The image I used I copied from a conservative Christina site that included the quote from John about the “Word became flesh”. It’s so ironic how they don’t make the connection. I actually should have used that in my article.

    In a sense John 1:14 is literally true, it ironically actually does describe the process of how belief in Jesus developed. Quite literally, the “word” (not Word) is what became flesh in the minds of people.

    So crazy that they don’t see it…

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.