Just in case anyone missed it. . . . Tim Widowfield of Vridar posted a rather insightful and well-researched article addressing a slight weakness in Daniel Gullotta’s review of Richard Carrier’s On the Historicity of Jesus.
The Function of the Term: “Born of a Woman”
The TW post incidentally addresses a very common deficiency in biblical scholarship that has long been noticed by a few lay readers but that has yet to be addressed by the mainstream scholarly elites who have a vested interest in correcting “misperceptions” about their arguments as they appear on the world wide web.
I will be adding this post in due course to our archive on related articles @ The “Born of a Woman” / Galatians 4:4 INDEX
The following two tabs change content below.
Neil Godfrey
Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.
Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)
- A Few Memories from the visiting Met - 2021-10-15 14:56:24 GMT+0000
- Finding Jesus in (or through) Josephus - 2021-10-13 08:22:19 GMT+0000
- Mary, Mary, who are you? – part 2 - 2021-10-11 13:09:37 GMT+0000
If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!
4 thoughts on “Daniel Gullotta’s Review of Richard Carrier’s “On the Historicity of Jesus”: that “born of a woman” passage (again)”