Just in case anyone missed it. . . . Tim Widowfield of Vridar posted a rather insightful and well-researched article addressing a slight weakness in Daniel Gullotta’s review of Richard Carrier’s On the Historicity of Jesus.
The Function of the Term: “Born of a Woman”
The TW post incidentally addresses a very common deficiency in biblical scholarship that has long been noticed by a few lay readers but that has yet to be addressed by the mainstream scholarly elites who have a vested interest in correcting “misperceptions” about their arguments as they appear on the world wide web.
I will be adding this post in due course to our archive on related articles @ The “Born of a Woman” / Galatians 4:4 INDEX
Related Posts
Carrier, Lataster and Another Small Stumbling Block
Another review of Richard Carrier’s On the Historicity of Jesus- Reply to Larry Hurtado: “Why the “Mythical Jesus” Claim Has No Traction with Scholars”
“Born of a Woman” — Sober Scholarship Questioning the Authenticity of Galatians 4:4
The Function of the Term: “Born of a Woman”- Reply to Hoffmann’s “On Not Explaining ‘Born of a Woman'”
E. Harding on What the British Did to India: “"Have you read Tharoor’s book or do you disagree with some of the points he concludes simply because other works…” Jun 24, 23:53
