Just in case anyone missed it. . . . Tim Widowfield of Vridar posted a rather insightful and well-researched article addressing a slight weakness in Daniel Gullotta’s review of Richard Carrier’s On the Historicity of Jesus.
The Function of the Term: “Born of a Woman”
The TW post incidentally addresses a very common deficiency in biblical scholarship that has long been noticed by a few lay readers but that has yet to be addressed by the mainstream scholarly elites who have a vested interest in correcting “misperceptions” about their arguments as they appear on the world wide web.
I will be adding this post in due course to our archive on related articles @ The “Born of a Woman” / Galatians 4:4 INDEX
Neil Godfrey
Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)
- Do the Dead Sea Scrolls Invalidate a Hellenistic Origin of the Hebrew Books of the Bible? - 2024-03-17 22:40:40 GMT+0000
- The Difference between Magpies and Chooks - 2024-03-15 09:21:13 GMT+0000
- The Hebrew Bible – Composed only 300 years before Christ? - 2024-03-14 10:35:40 GMT+0000
If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!
4 thoughts on “Daniel Gullotta’s Review of Richard Carrier’s “On the Historicity of Jesus”: that “born of a woman” passage (again)”