2017-02-15

Dating DSS Awry #1 — Appendix

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

This post is an appendix to How Dating the Dead Sea Scrolls Went Awry — #1.

Solomon Birnbaum’s palaeographic dating of the DSS to the mid 1st C BCE was published in the Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research No. 115 (Oct., 1949), pp. 20-22, “The Date of the Cave Scrolls“.

Birnbaum compared the Isaiah Scroll from Cave 1 with the Nash Papyrus. He set out key letters from each as follows:

The result of the comparison was then applied to the Covenant Scroll and the Habakkuk Commentary also from Cave 1:

Bio
Latest Posts

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

How Jesus Historicists and Mythicists Can Work Together (or, How to do History) - 2022-01-22 07:30:57 GMT+0000
Bearing False Witness for Jesus - 2022-01-18 01:12:46 GMT+0000
Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear? - 2022-01-17 05:02:14 GMT+0000

One thought on “Dating DSS Awry #1 — Appendix”

Pingback: Vridar » Dating the Dead Sea Scrolls — #2

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

"Neil Godfrey and Tim Widowfield, who both write at Vridar . . . happen to be some of the most astute and well-read amateurs you can read on the internet on the subject of biblical historicity. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they don’t have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. But I have often been impressed with their grasp of logic and analysis of scholarship. I don’t always agree with them, but I respect their work."

— Richard Carrier, – March 2014
"Neil, for what it is worth it is obvious to me that if you had earlier in life tracked into a graduate program at one of the world’s leading research universities you would be one of the world’s formidable ones. You are doing essentially the same quality now (apart from the philology and languages) except mostly sticking to commenting on others’ work as informed comment/discussion."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"I still wonder at all the material you turn out for Vridar. The more I read your stuff (and I still do, of course), the more I realize how much we all owe you. Your voice is unique."

— Earl Doherty, November 2013 (personal email)
"Thanks much for this book review. I think it expands, and contributes to, the effort in honouring Thomas that we with Lukasz originally had in mind with this volume. Best, Emanuel"

-- Emanuel Pfoh - August 2020
"I want to say here that this site is so resourceful and highly on top of the most modern scholarship in the areas discussed here. . . I know of no other site which offers a wide range of topics related to careful critical analysis of historically and scripturally related issues."

-- Martin Lewadny, - March 2009
"Here I give an admittedly subjective short list, in random order, of useful, high level and regularly updated weblogs on the study of the Old Testament . . . ‘Vridar: Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science’ (http://vridar.org/) by Neil Godfrey"

-- Klaas Spronk, - Bibliotheca Orientalis LXXI, 3/4 (2014)
"These reviews of yours are so bloody weird!"

— James Crossley, – April 2010
"Neil, You’ve done a clean job in your posting on ‘Jesus the Healer’. It reflects well on you. Best, John"

— John Moles, September 2011 (personal email)
"I always enjoy reading Neil’s blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest."

— April DeConick, – November 2007
"I think you have a high quality blog that provides a positive public service by discussing academic topics within a wider audience."

— Russell Gmirkin, – October 2016
"I’d like to thank you for this very nice representation of what I was trying to show in the book. It’s always gratifying when a reader zeroes in on exactly those aspects I thought were most interesting and most central to my argument. Thank you for this careful and engaged reading of my work – much appreciated!"

— Eva Mroczek, – June 2017
"I find your blog most interesting and appreciate your ongoing effort to keep to the evidence for the issues discussed!"

-- Thomas L. Thompson, - April 2020
"Neil, this is actually rather useful. Good job."

— R. Joseph Hoffmann, – June 2014
"I’ve even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really don’t know how to take, so thanks, I think, but I’m not sure, Vrider (even though I feel like I need to take a shower now))."

-- Jim West, – September 2010
"Thanks for your very elaborate review! I realized that I hadn’t added your blog to our blogroll. This oversight has been corrected. Looking forward to more segments."

— Anthony Le Donne, – September 2009
"For an excellent example of generally high-quality scholarship by someone who isn’t a biblical studies professor, see Neil Godfrey’s work posted on the website vridar.org."

— Tom Dykstra, – JOCABS 2015
"Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"Fantastic. I’m so glad you’re helping to spread these ideas!"

Nancy Fraser - June 2019 (personal email)
"Very good. This post is going straight to the March 2016 Biblical Studies Carnival."

—N.T. Wrong, – March 2016
"I have found your website really valuable as an interpretive filter for Biblical scholarship, especially the origins of Christianity and historicity of Jesus issue. Your clarity of expression, fair comments and personal insights are much valued. I refer to your site frequently as yet more names and publications pop up requiring an academic critique and helpful recommendations for book purchases. So, please continue to delve deeply and share this intellectual sustenance with your grateful readers."

— Mary Booker, – February 2020 (personal email)
"Note that I do not use the term ‘amateur’ pejoratively. . . . In fact, Godfrey is extremely well read and his librarian skills have brought many important academic works to my attention."

Raphael Lataster - August 2019
"Thanks for this detailed interaction! I’ll try to offer something more substantial than 'Thank you' in response at some point, but I didn’t want to wait . . . to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what I’ve written!"

— James McGrath, – June 2009
"By the way, my thanks to Neil for an ongoing superb job of exposing Jim’s review for what it is: a farcical and none too effective exercise in mythicism assassination, nothing to do with rational, let alone unbiased, scholarship. I’m also happy to see even Jim giving Neil credit where credit is due."

— Earl Doherty, June 2011
"Many thanks for this post, and for the quality of your blog."

— Philippe Wajdenbaum, – November 2018

Gary on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: ““Ultimately, answers to the question of whether you consider this body of evidence sufficient to justify belief in Jesus’s historicity…” Jan 21, 15:29
Neil Godfrey on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “Scholarly consensus does not of itself equate with unscientific dogma. In the case of the question of the historicity of…” Jan 21, 07:41
RoHa on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “Those of us who are sceptical of the fashionable hypothesis of man-made climate change also face ad hominem insults, bleatings…” Jan 21, 07:19
Neil Godfrey on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “Well well, will you look at that! Had I waited a day I could have saved myself a post and…” Jan 21, 06:21
Neil Godfrey on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “Indeed. John Dickson is a well-known evangelist spreading the word of Jesus. When I worked at Darwin up on the…” Jan 21, 06:18
Neil Godfrey on Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear?: “While actual “readership” of works was small those who were exposed to them was much larger. In the case of…” Jan 21, 06:14
Mark on Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear?: “Re: Marcionism having Samaritan roots Does that colorful guy from the circus Huller have anything to say about this being…” Jan 21, 04:32
MrHorse on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “‘On historians and the historicity of Jesus — a response to John Dickson’ https://www.abc.net.au/religion/miles-pattenden-historians-and-the-historicity-of-jesus/13720952” Jan 21, 00:52
A Buddhist on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “I certainly welcome refutations of Jesus-mythicism, so long as it is respectful, by which I mean that it addresses the…” Jan 21, 00:13

Recent Posts

How Jesus Historicists and Mythicists Can Work Together (or, How to do History) 2022-01-22 07:30:57 GMT+0000

Bearing False Witness for Jesus 2022-01-18 01:12:46 GMT+0000

Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear? 2022-01-17 05:02:14 GMT+0000

Nero – Followup #2 2022-01-15 12:17:08 GMT+0000

Nero – the Followup: Reviews of Barrett’s Discussion of the Neronian Persecution 2022-01-15 09:12:30 GMT+0000

Rome Burning – the Christian Problem in the Annals of Tacitus 2022-01-13 14:55:18 GMT+0000

Rome Burning – Difficulties with the Tacitus Passage 2022-01-11 11:17:40 GMT+0000

Rome Burning — and the Christians: A New Study 2022-01-10 21:48:19 GMT+0000

After the Transfiguration of Jesus — Some Lesser Known Allusions to Moses 2022-01-05 23:38:48 GMT+0000

What’s a lonely Jesus to do? 2022-01-04 23:52:09 GMT+0000

The Fairy Tale Ideal World of the Gospel Story as a Living Hell 2022-01-03 14:01:47 GMT+0000

The Intelligence Trap: Why Smart People Make Dumb Mistakes 2022-01-02 23:47:55 GMT+0000

A Common Origin – One Wonders 2022-01-01 11:27:06 GMT+0000

Sermon on the Mount – Bruno Bauer update 2021-12-31 08:41:30 GMT+0000

Further updates 2021-12-23 21:53:37 GMT+0000

From Hermes to Yahweh 2021-12-21 22:19:37 GMT+0000

Updates – Late gospels and Josephus’s guilt-inspired prophecy 2021-12-20 10:43:38 GMT+0000

On Charity and Tyrants 2021-12-18 22:01:21 GMT+0000

New Thoughts on Christian Origins 2021-12-17 13:38:17 GMT+0000

Where none shall hunger 2021-12-09 23:28:54 GMT+0000

Most-Used Tags

Acts of the Apostles

Australia

Bart Ehrman

Bauckham: Jesus and the Eyewitnesses

Biblical Scholarship

Charbonnel: Jesus Christ sublime figure de papier

Christianity

Christian Origins

Christ Myth Debate

Christ Myth Debate: Doherty

Criteria of Authenticity

Doherty: Jesus Neither God Nor Man

Earl Doherty

Epistles

Exchanges with McGrath

Fundamentalism

God and Other Deities

Gospel of John

Gospel of Luke

Gospel of Mark

Gospel of Matthew

Gospels

Gospels and Acts (Canonical)

Historical Jesus

Historical Method

Intertextuality

Islam

Israel-Palestine

James McGrath

John the Baptist

Josephus

Marcion

Maurice Casey

Midrash

Paul

Paul and his letters

Richard Bauckham

Richard Carrier

Robert M. Price

Roger Parvus

Terrorism

Thomas Brodie

Trump

USA

Vridar blog

Archives
Archives
Calendar
February 2017

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

19 20 21 22 23 24 25

26 27 28

« Jan Mar »
Meta

Log in

Entries feed

Comments feed

WordPress.org

2017-02-15

Dating DSS Awry #1 — Appendix

by Neil Godfrey

Neil Godfrey

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Like this:

Related Posts on Vridar

One thought on “Dating DSS Awry #1 — Appendix”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Neil Godfrey

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Share this:

Like this:

Related Posts on Vridar

One thought on “Dating DSS Awry #1 — Appendix”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply