Comments have been reopened on my latest past on Plato and the Bible — Thanks to E.Harding for alerting me to their locked status. Have no idea what happened there, why or how the option was turned off for a while.
|The first Christians shared all things in common; the first people of God began as a nation of twelve tribes. Plato would have been impressed with both beginnings.|
Previous in this series:
- Plato’s and the Bible’s Ideal Laws: Similarities 1:631-637 (2015-06-22)
- Plato’s and Bible’s Laws: Similarities, completing Book 1 of Laws (2015-06-23)
- Plato’s Laws, Book 2, and Biblical Values (2015-07-13)
- Plato and the Bible on the Origins of Civilization (2015-08-13)
- Bible’s Presentation of Law as a Model of Plato’s Ideal (2015-08-24)
|Laws 739b-c||Acts 2:42-47|
|The first and highest form of the state and of the government and of the law is that in which there prevails most widely the ancient saying, that “Friends have all things in common.” Whether there is anywhere now, or will ever be, this communion of women and children and of property, in which the private and individual is altogether banished from life, and things which are by nature private, such as eyes and ears and hands, have become common, and in some way see and hear and act in common, and all men express praise and blame and feel joy and sorrow on the same occasions, and whatever laws there are unite the city to the utmost-whether all this is possible or not, I say that no man, acting upon any other principle, will ever constitute a state which will be truer or better or more exalted in virtue.||
And they continued stedfastly in the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, in the breaking of bread and the prayers.
So began the Christian church, one body, having all things common, like-minded, expressing praise and feeling joy together daily.
If we wink at the fact that Luke probably didn’t mean to indicate that the women and children were included in the common property Plato would have said
no one will ever lay down another definition [of a State] that is truer or better than these conditions in point of super-excellence. (739c Bury’s translation)
People in such an ideal state would inevitably be “happy”:
Whether such a state is governed by Gods or sons of Gods, one, or more than one, happy are the men who, living after this manner, dwell there. . .
|Laws 745d||Ezekiel 47:13, Numbers 1:44 & Matthew 19:28|
|And the legislator shall divide the citizens into twelve parts,
and arrange the rest of their property, as far as possible, so as to form twelve equal parts;
and there shall be a registration of all.
Ye shall divide the land for inheritance according to the twelve tribes of Israel . . . .
These were the men registered by Moses and Aaron and the twelve leaders of Israel.
The Son of man shall sit on the throne of his glory, ye also shall sit upon twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel.
Plato was imagining an ideal state. Having all things in common he considered to be too idealistic to be practical so he considered next-best options. Twelve tribes was the more realistic option, each tribe named after one of the twelve gods of Olympus. The land was to be divided “equally” but that meant larger allotments would be created to compensate for poorer quality soil in some areas. There was to be a methodical census of all citizens.
We know the story of the twelve tribes of Israel, both the original one from Genesis and the renewed one with the twelve apostles.
Let’s backtrack and start at the beginning. Book 5 begins with the most important things, the gods, followed by those next in rank, the “demons”, then the human soul (our divine part), and finally the human body, and speaks of the respective honours each is owed. Continue reading “Plato’s and the Bible’s Ideal States”