2015-02-27

On to Salon.com — Is this going viral?

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

First, Alternet, and now it’s on Salon.com

Bio
Latest Posts

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Getting History for Atheists Wrong (Again) — #3 - 2021-05-07 23:25:23 GMT+0000
more little gems from a Hillsong ex-insider — including some Christianese - 2021-05-04 22:22:42 GMT+0000
The Mind of a Hillsong Insider — Both Inside and Out - 2021-05-03 21:01:17 GMT+0000

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

“Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on.”

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019

Neil Godfrey on Getting History for Atheists Wrong (Again) — #3: “I think is unfair and distortive of the main point to focus on O’Neill, as many more qualified and recognizable…” May 8, 23:41
MrHorse on Getting History for Atheists Wrong (Again) — #3: “re (1), “many more qualified and recognizable people defend similar views, including Carrier, Ehrman, Dennett.” What ‘views’ are you referring…” May 8, 22:25
Neil Godfrey on Getting History for Atheists Wrong (Again) — #3: “My interest from the perspective of historical inquiry is to understand the best explanation for the sources we have for…” May 8, 18:25
Neil Godfrey on Getting History for Atheists Wrong (Again) — #3: “Can you give some examples of what you consider historians can only offer with varying degrees of probability? I think…” May 8, 18:18
Giuseppe Ferri on Getting History for Atheists Wrong (Again) — #3: “Paradoxically, there may be the “coincidence” that just the Risen Jesus (sic) may be described as a mere historical human.…” May 8, 17:47
Hugo on Getting History for Atheists Wrong (Again) — #3: “Hi Neil, I’ve been reading and learning from you for many years for free, so it is only fair that…” May 8, 14:53
Neil Godfrey on Was Marcion Right about Paul’s letters?: “I’m not the one to ask, sorry. The best I can do is to point you to posts by Roger…” May 8, 02:54
Ken on Was Marcion Right about Paul’s letters?: “Neil can you comment more on how the Gospels were interpolated by people who Judaized them and who turned their…” May 7, 15:51
Wayne Randall on Getting History for Atheists Wrong (Again – and not just Probably) — #2: “Apparently lifted from a 1946 novel: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Jesus which I vaguely remember skimming through once years ago.” May 7, 10:42

Recent Posts

Getting History for Atheists Wrong (Again) — #3 2021-05-07 23:25:23 GMT+0000

more little gems from a Hillsong ex-insider — including some Christianese 2021-05-04 22:22:42 GMT+0000

The Mind of a Hillsong Insider — Both Inside and Out 2021-05-03 21:01:17 GMT+0000

Getting History for Atheists Wrong (Again – and not just Probably) — #2 2021-05-02 02:31:33 GMT+0000

Is Efron Also Among the Mythicists? 2021-04-30 23:34:24 GMT+0000

Is the Entire James Passage in Josephus an Interpolation? 2021-04-30 22:52:59 GMT+0000

Getting History for Atheists Wrong (Again) — #1 2021-04-29 05:35:05 GMT+0000

John the Baptist — Another Case for Forgery in Josephus (conclusion) 2021-04-28 02:33:17 GMT+0000

Parallels — How to tell if they are “Real” 2021-04-22 21:24:04 GMT+0000

Peter, a real “son of Jonah” – part 2 2021-04-20 01:24:36 GMT+0000

Peter, a real “son of Jonah” – part 1 2021-04-19 23:55:47 GMT+0000

Paul and Jesus: Mirrored Rejections, Deaths and Resurrections 2021-04-18 02:57:08 GMT+0000

Paul is Jesus Redivivus in Acts 2021-04-17 14:04:02 GMT+0000

John the Baptist in Josephus — What was his baptism? 2021-04-16 09:27:19 GMT+0000

Hector Avalos has died 2021-04-15 02:47:20 GMT+0000

4 Jewish Word Plays behind the Word Becoming Flesh / 3 … (Charbonnel: Jésus-Christ, Sublime Figure de Papier) 2021-04-14 07:27:37 GMT+0000

Jewish Origin of the “Word Became Flesh” / 2 … (Charbonnel: Jésus-Christ, Sublime Figure de Papier) 2021-04-12 10:30:06 GMT+0000

The Jewish Origins of the Word Becoming Flesh / 1 (Charbonnel: Jésus-Christ, Sublime Figure de Papier) 2021-04-09 10:17:03 GMT+0000

“If I were an Australian journalist, I would jump at this.” 2021-04-06 08:33:34 GMT+0000

What Did Josephus Think of John the Baptist? 2021-04-05 02:27:28 GMT+0000

Most-Used Tags

Acts of the Apostles

Ancient historians

Australia

Bart Ehrman

Bauckham: Jesus and the Eyewitnesses

Biblical Scholarship

Christianity

Christian Origins

Christ Myth Debate

Christ Myth Debate: Doherty

Criteria of Authenticity

Doherty: Jesus Neither God Nor Man

Earl Doherty

Epistles

Exchanges with McGrath

Fundamentalism

God and Other Deities

Gospel of John

Gospel of Luke

Gospel of Mark

Gospel of Matthew

Gospels

Gospels and Acts (Canonical)

Historical Jesus

Historical Method

Intertextuality

Islam

Israel

Israel-Palestine

James McGrath

John the Baptist

Josephus

Marcion

Maurice Casey

Paul

Paul and his letters

Richard Bauckham

Richard Carrier

Robert M. Price

Roger Parvus

Terrorism

Thomas Brodie

Trump

USA

Vridar blog

Archives
Archives
Calendar
February 2015

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

« Jan Mar »
Meta

Log in

Entries feed

Comments feed

WordPress.org

2015-02-27

On to Salon.com — Is this going viral?

by Neil Godfrey

Neil Godfrey

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Like this:

Related Posts on Vridar

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Neil Godfrey

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Share this:

Like this:

Related Posts on Vridar

Leave a Comment Cancel reply