2012-06-15

Earl Doherty’s next installment delayed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

Real life issues — health, work, family, personal — sometimes mean that even dedicated internet authors and assistant bloggers cannot keep up a regular schedule. Earl Doherty’s next installment will appear this coming Sunday/Monday (depending on your time zone).

Bio
Latest Posts

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

How Jesus Historicists and Mythicists Can Work Together (or, How to do History) - 2022-01-22 07:30:57 GMT+0000
Bearing False Witness for Jesus - 2022-01-18 01:12:46 GMT+0000
Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear? - 2022-01-17 05:02:14 GMT+0000

0 thoughts on “Earl Doherty’s next installment delayed”

Willie Buck Merle says:

2012-06-15 08:14:52 GMT+0000 at 08:14

Understandable. He’s really taking all this to the house (hoop lingo).

Loading...

Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

"Here I give an admittedly subjective short list, in random order, of useful, high level and regularly updated weblogs on the study of the Old Testament . . . ‘Vridar: Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science’ (http://vridar.org/) by Neil Godfrey"

-- Klaas Spronk, - Bibliotheca Orientalis LXXI, 3/4 (2014)
"I have found your website really valuable as an interpretive filter for Biblical scholarship, especially the origins of Christianity and historicity of Jesus issue. Your clarity of expression, fair comments and personal insights are much valued. I refer to your site frequently as yet more names and publications pop up requiring an academic critique and helpful recommendations for book purchases. So, please continue to delve deeply and share this intellectual sustenance with your grateful readers."

— Mary Booker, – February 2020 (personal email)
"Neil Godfrey and Tim Widowfield, who both write at Vridar . . . happen to be some of the most astute and well-read amateurs you can read on the internet on the subject of biblical historicity. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they don’t have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. But I have often been impressed with their grasp of logic and analysis of scholarship. I don’t always agree with them, but I respect their work."

— Richard Carrier, – March 2014
"Neil, this is actually rather useful. Good job."

— R. Joseph Hoffmann, – June 2014
"By the way, my thanks to Neil for an ongoing superb job of exposing Jim’s review for what it is: a farcical and none too effective exercise in mythicism assassination, nothing to do with rational, let alone unbiased, scholarship. I’m also happy to see even Jim giving Neil credit where credit is due."

— Earl Doherty, June 2011
"I’d like to thank you for this very nice representation of what I was trying to show in the book. It’s always gratifying when a reader zeroes in on exactly those aspects I thought were most interesting and most central to my argument. Thank you for this careful and engaged reading of my work – much appreciated!"

— Eva Mroczek, – June 2017
"Thanks for your very elaborate review! I realized that I hadn’t added your blog to our blogroll. This oversight has been corrected. Looking forward to more segments."

— Anthony Le Donne, – September 2009
"I’ve even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really don’t know how to take, so thanks, I think, but I’m not sure, Vrider (even though I feel like I need to take a shower now))."

-- Jim West, – September 2010
"Very good. This post is going straight to the March 2016 Biblical Studies Carnival."

—N.T. Wrong, – March 2016
"Many thanks for this post, and for the quality of your blog."

— Philippe Wajdenbaum, – November 2018
"Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"I still wonder at all the material you turn out for Vridar. The more I read your stuff (and I still do, of course), the more I realize how much we all owe you. Your voice is unique."

— Earl Doherty, November 2013 (personal email)
"I want to say here that this site is so resourceful and highly on top of the most modern scholarship in the areas discussed here. . . I know of no other site which offers a wide range of topics related to careful critical analysis of historically and scripturally related issues."

-- Martin Lewadny, - March 2009
"Note that I do not use the term ‘amateur’ pejoratively. . . . In fact, Godfrey is extremely well read and his librarian skills have brought many important academic works to my attention."

Raphael Lataster - August 2019
"Thanks for this detailed interaction! I’ll try to offer something more substantial than 'Thank you' in response at some point, but I didn’t want to wait . . . to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what I’ve written!"

— James McGrath, – June 2009
"Neil, You’ve done a clean job in your posting on ‘Jesus the Healer’. It reflects well on you. Best, John"

— John Moles, September 2011 (personal email)
"I think you have a high quality blog that provides a positive public service by discussing academic topics within a wider audience."

— Russell Gmirkin, – October 2016
"For an excellent example of generally high-quality scholarship by someone who isn’t a biblical studies professor, see Neil Godfrey’s work posted on the website vridar.org."

— Tom Dykstra, – JOCABS 2015
"These reviews of yours are so bloody weird!"

— James Crossley, – April 2010
"Thanks much for this book review. I think it expands, and contributes to, the effort in honouring Thomas that we with Lukasz originally had in mind with this volume. Best, Emanuel"

-- Emanuel Pfoh - August 2020
"I find your blog most interesting and appreciate your ongoing effort to keep to the evidence for the issues discussed!"

-- Thomas L. Thompson, - April 2020
"Neil, for what it is worth it is obvious to me that if you had earlier in life tracked into a graduate program at one of the world’s leading research universities you would be one of the world’s formidable ones. You are doing essentially the same quality now (apart from the philology and languages) except mostly sticking to commenting on others’ work as informed comment/discussion."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"I always enjoy reading Neil’s blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest."

— April DeConick, – November 2007
"Fantastic. I’m so glad you’re helping to spread these ideas!"

Nancy Fraser - June 2019 (personal email)

A Buddhist on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “I can think of several (living) academics who doubt Jesus’ existence and are qualified most of those scholars, while they…” Jan 23, 21:41
Neil Godfrey on How Jesus Historicists and Mythicists Can Work Together (or, How to do History): “After I have finished uploading translations of Bruno Bauer’s criticism of the synoptic gospels I hope to turn to his…” Jan 23, 21:38
Neil Godfrey on How Jesus Historicists and Mythicists Can Work Together (or, How to do History): “Hi Geoff. Yes, I do confess I have some problems with the Clossey et al’s three-part article and that is…” Jan 23, 21:27
db on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: ““Comment by Chris_Hansen97—18 January 2022″—per “Jesus Mythicism Is About to Go Mainstream”. r/AcademicBiblical. 18 January 2022. [Per the article by…” Jan 23, 18:52
Geoff Sankey on How Jesus Historicists and Mythicists Can Work Together (or, How to do History): “Thanks Neil. You have carefully navigated a path through the documents to which you refer and explained a succinct and…” Jan 23, 18:05
A Buddhist on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “In that, then, is the difference between disputes about Jesus and climate change. Scholars of Jesus use the tactics to…” Jan 23, 15:19
A Buddhist on How Jesus Historicists and Mythicists Can Work Together (or, How to do History): “Neil, what “evidence that we have” are you referring to? I assume that you are referring to the non-canonical texts…” Jan 23, 15:06
RoHa on How Jesus Historicists and Mythicists Can Work Together (or, How to do History): “The conflicts between the stories told in the letters and the story told in Acts are a good reason for…” Jan 23, 05:08
RoHa on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “Actually, the suggestion that climate change is not man-made is frequently ridiculed. Professional scientists usually avoid the tactics I referred…” Jan 23, 04:56

Recent Posts

How Jesus Historicists and Mythicists Can Work Together (or, How to do History) 2022-01-22 07:30:57 GMT+0000

Bearing False Witness for Jesus 2022-01-18 01:12:46 GMT+0000

Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear? 2022-01-17 05:02:14 GMT+0000

Nero – Followup #2 2022-01-15 12:17:08 GMT+0000

Nero – the Followup: Reviews of Barrett’s Discussion of the Neronian Persecution 2022-01-15 09:12:30 GMT+0000

Rome Burning – the Christian Problem in the Annals of Tacitus 2022-01-13 14:55:18 GMT+0000

Rome Burning – Difficulties with the Tacitus Passage 2022-01-11 11:17:40 GMT+0000

Rome Burning — and the Christians: A New Study 2022-01-10 21:48:19 GMT+0000

After the Transfiguration of Jesus — Some Lesser Known Allusions to Moses 2022-01-05 23:38:48 GMT+0000

What’s a lonely Jesus to do? 2022-01-04 23:52:09 GMT+0000

The Fairy Tale Ideal World of the Gospel Story as a Living Hell 2022-01-03 14:01:47 GMT+0000

The Intelligence Trap: Why Smart People Make Dumb Mistakes 2022-01-02 23:47:55 GMT+0000

A Common Origin – One Wonders 2022-01-01 11:27:06 GMT+0000

Sermon on the Mount – Bruno Bauer update 2021-12-31 08:41:30 GMT+0000

Further updates 2021-12-23 21:53:37 GMT+0000

From Hermes to Yahweh 2021-12-21 22:19:37 GMT+0000

Updates – Late gospels and Josephus’s guilt-inspired prophecy 2021-12-20 10:43:38 GMT+0000

On Charity and Tyrants 2021-12-18 22:01:21 GMT+0000

New Thoughts on Christian Origins 2021-12-17 13:38:17 GMT+0000

Where none shall hunger 2021-12-09 23:28:54 GMT+0000

Most-Used Tags

Acts of the Apostles

Australia

Bart Ehrman

Bauckham: Jesus and the Eyewitnesses

Biblical Scholarship

Charbonnel: Jesus Christ sublime figure de papier

Christianity

Christian Origins

Christ Myth Debate

Christ Myth Debate: Doherty

Criteria of Authenticity

Doherty: Jesus Neither God Nor Man

Earl Doherty

Epistles

Exchanges with McGrath

Fundamentalism

God and Other Deities

Gospel of John

Gospel of Luke

Gospel of Mark

Gospel of Matthew

Gospels

Gospels and Acts (Canonical)

Historical Jesus

Historical Method

Intertextuality

Islam

Israel-Palestine

James McGrath

John the Baptist

Josephus

Marcion

Maurice Casey

Midrash

Paul

Paul and his letters

Richard Bauckham

Richard Carrier

Robert M. Price

Roger Parvus

Terrorism

Thomas Brodie

Trump

USA

Vridar blog

Archives
Archives
Calendar
June 2012

S M T W T F S

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16

17 18 19 20 21 22 23

24 25 26 27 28 29 30

« May Jul »
Meta

Log in

Entries feed

Comments feed

WordPress.org

2012-06-15

Earl Doherty’s next installment delayed

by Neil Godfrey

Neil Godfrey

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Like this:

Related Posts on Vridar

0 thoughts on “Earl Doherty’s next installment delayed”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Neil Godfrey

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Share this:

Like this:

Related Posts on Vridar

0 thoughts on “Earl Doherty’s next installment delayed”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply