2020-11-30

Assange

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

A remarkable observation by Philip Adams in his Foreword to A Secret Australia, a new book about Julian Assange. It goes straight to the heart of the matter: Assange is a publisher, but look how he’s being treated pic.twitter.com/SRUGGmwUSv

— Julian Burnside (@JulianBurnside) November 29, 2020

Bio
Latest Posts

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Is Everything a Question of Probability? - 2024-12-15 03:04:03 GMT+0000
The Folly of Bayesian Probability in “Doing History” - 2024-12-13 05:51:46 GMT+0000
Jesus Mythicism and Historical Knowledge, Part 4: Did Jesus Exist? - 2024-11-27 08:20:47 GMT+0000

If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!

7 thoughts on “Assange”

Peter Grullemans says:

2020-11-30 22:07:22 GMT+0000 at 22:07

Thank you Neil for helping bring attention to Julian Assange’s plight, a situation I feel very passionate about as Julian Assange suffers for heroically exposing the truth . I admire both Julian Burnside and Philip Adams and look forward to redaing Julian’s book.
.
It disgusts me that we Australians care so little about Julian. Our governments both Liberal and Labour quake in their boots at the thought that we might lose favour with the US. We have an inferiority complex. Every one of us should be on the phone, on our email and writing hard-copy letters to our local members of federal parliament, the Minister of Foreign Affairs (Marise Payne) and the Prime Minister (Scott Morrison) to say “No!” to the US and insist on his release.
.
Journalism is not a crime, but Julian is being punished for exposing US war crimes. Only when enough Australians care about the evil of the US military industrial regime will we all have a chance to slow its growth. The charges against Julian include espionage – assisting then Private Bradley Manning to take information from the US defence data base, commonly called hacking. As I understand it that’s the essence of the US’s case and apart from us demanding that Julian be freed from the torture of his inhumane confinement in Belmarsh, we can donate to Wikileaks should support his legal costs to defend that case.
.
Last Friday afternoon 27/11/20 at Sydney Town Hall steps we heard from Julian’s dad and several others, including former Major David McBride and his lawyer about Julian’s plight, and David’s, another whistleblower for the more recent Afghan war crimes he reported committed by Australian soldiers. David is also facing life imprisonment if convicted. He needs our support too.
.
All in the name of national security ! This is ridiculous and immoral in itself given that many of the laws that were enacted to address this concern are offshoots of the 911 fraud. I recommend the Q&A program in June this year featuring former Senator Nick Xenophon to learn about David’s case :
.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIxDDSaY0Yw
.
Both David and Julian, along with Witness K and his lawyer Bernard Collaery who exposed the Australian government spying on East Timor are victims of our apathy. Sometimes I am ashamed to be Australian when we hide behind “national security” as our government hides behind the US military might.

Reply
1. Neil Godfrey says:
  
  2020-12-01 03:23:43 GMT+0000 at 03:23
  
  Thanks, Peter. Glad you raised the two other national whistleblower cases. Thank god we have a few lawyers like Julian Burnside.
  
  https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/nov/25/handcuffed-asylum-seekers-paraded-like-criminals-in-australian-hospitals-doctors-say
  
  Reply
Bob Moore says:

2020-12-01 03:28:22 GMT+0000 at 03:28

For Craig Murray’s account of the days of Assange’s hearing see https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2020/09/your-man-in-the-public-gallery-the-assange-hearing-day-6/ You can navigate to all Murray’s postings on “Our Man in the Public Gallery” from there.

Reply
1. Neil Godfrey says:
  
  2020-12-01 08:18:07 GMT+0000 at 08:18
  
  Allow me to draw particular attention to the attached testimonies on the Day 21 post:
  
  https://www.assangecampaign.org.au/your-man-in-the-public-gallery-assange-hearing-day-21/ — one by Noam Chomsky, the other by “Witness 2”
  
  Reply
Peter Grullemans says:

2020-12-01 05:10:34 GMT+0000 at 05:10

For those interested in more details of last Friday’s support Julian Assange effort please see
.
https://centralnews.com.au/2020/11/30/one-year-assange-protests/

Reply
Neil Godfrey says:

2020-12-01 08:11:58 GMT+0000 at 08:11

In addition to the above important recommendations from Bob and Peter ….

https://www.assangecampaign.org.au/

(this site includes a page on the book launch of A Secret Australia: https://www.assangecampaign.org.au/a-secret-australia-book-launch/)

and

https://consortiumnews.com/

Reply
Grabrich says:

2020-12-02 02:23:19 GMT+0000 at 02:23

I was just about to mention consortiumnews.com, but Neil beat me to it.
Joe Lauria and his contributors have done excellent work covering the Assange situation.

Richard G.

Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

It is worth saying another word of appreciation here for Neil Godfrey's effort to make Bruno Bauer accessible in English.

-- Peter Kirby, - May 2023
"Neil Godfrey and Tim Widowfield, who both write at Vridar . . . happen to be some of the most astute and well-read amateurs you can read on the internet on the subject of biblical historicity. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they don’t have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. But I have often been impressed with their grasp of logic and analysis of scholarship. I don’t always agree with them, but I respect their work."

— Richard Carrier, – March 2014
"I want to say here that this site is so resourceful and highly on top of the most modern scholarship in the areas discussed here. . . I know of no other site which offers a wide range of topics related to careful critical analysis of historically and scripturally related issues."

-- Martin Lewadny, - March 2009
"Thanks for this detailed interaction! I’ll try to offer something more substantial than 'Thank you' in response at some point, but I didn’t want to wait . . . to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what I’ve written!"

— James McGrath, – June 2009
"I’ve even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really don’t know how to take, so thanks, I think, but I’m not sure, Vrider (even though I feel like I need to take a shower now))."

-- Jim West, – September 2010
"Thanks for your very elaborate review! I realized that I hadn’t added your blog to our blogroll. This oversight has been corrected. Looking forward to more segments."

— Anthony Le Donne, – September 2009
"Many thanks for this post, and for the quality of your blog."

— Philippe Wajdenbaum, – November 2018
This is superb work, Neil, and reminds me of Albert Schweitzer’s work from a century ago. . . . .

I commend you for being the first to even TRY to translate Bruno Bauer’s brilliant Kritik der Evangelien und Geschichte ihres Ursprungs, which is now more than 150 years old.

. . . . .Thank you for your historic effort.

-- Paul Trejo, M.A., - November 2022
Editor, An English Edition of Bruno Bauer’s 1843 Christianity Exposed
"I’d like to thank you for this very nice representation of what I was trying to show in the book. It’s always gratifying when a reader zeroes in on exactly those aspects I thought were most interesting and most central to my argument. Thank you for this careful and engaged reading of my work – much appreciated!"

— Eva Mroczek, – June 2017
"Neil, in my mature judgement (I am now an old man), this fine 4-part study is a brilliant reworking, an instructive restatement of Hayden White’s Metahistory (and his subsequent writings). Your critique of certain historiographic representations as imbedded in the case study of the “scientistic”, “empirical” Richard Carrier provides a solid starting point for the more honest “fictive” reading of the New Testament that you encourage. Your last paragraph is a very intelligent call to sensitive readers of these texts. I suspect a whole generation of biblical students has been educated without the insights provided by the incomparable White. Bravo!"

-- Timothy Bagley, - November 2024
"Thanks much for this book review. I think it expands, and contributes to, the effort in honouring Thomas that we with Lukasz originally had in mind with this volume. Best, Emanuel"

-- Emanuel Pfoh - August 2020
https://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=145080#p145080
Neil made a good synthesis of the work without being an “expert” of the field.

-- Enrico Tuccinardi, - October 2022
"Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"Fantastic. I’m so glad you’re helping to spread these ideas!"

Nancy Fraser - June 2019 (personal email)
Congratulations, Vridar, . . . I declare, Vridar, your own hard work translating Bruno Bauer will make a major difference in future studies of Bruno Bauer and the evolution of Hegel’s philosophy of religion.

-- Paul Trejo, - April 2023
"Very good. This post is going straight to the March 2016 Biblical Studies Carnival."

—N.T. Wrong, – March 2016
"Neil, for what it is worth it is obvious to me that if you had earlier in life tracked into a graduate program at one of the world’s leading research universities you would be one of the world’s formidable ones. You are doing essentially the same quality now (apart from the philology and languages) except mostly sticking to commenting on others’ work as informed comment/discussion."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"I still wonder at all the material you turn out for Vridar. The more I read your stuff (and I still do, of course), the more I realize how much we all owe you. Your voice is unique."

— Earl Doherty, November 2013 (personal email)
"These reviews of yours are so bloody weird!"

— James Crossley, – April 2010
"For an excellent example of generally high-quality scholarship by someone who isn’t a biblical studies professor, see Neil Godfrey’s work posted on the website vridar.org."

— Tom Dykstra, – JOCABS 2015
"I always enjoy reading Neil’s blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest."

— April DeConick, – November 2007
"Here I give an admittedly subjective short list, in random order, of useful, high level and regularly updated weblogs on the study of the Old Testament . . . ‘Vridar: Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science’ (http://vridar.org/) by Neil Godfrey"

-- Klaas Spronk, - Bibliotheca Orientalis LXXI, 3/4 (2014)
"I have found your website really valuable as an interpretive filter for Biblical scholarship, especially the origins of Christianity and historicity of Jesus issue. Your clarity of expression, fair comments and personal insights are much valued. I refer to your site frequently as yet more names and publications pop up requiring an academic critique and helpful recommendations for book purchases. So, please continue to delve deeply and share this intellectual sustenance with your grateful readers."

— Mary Booker, – February 2020 (personal email)
"I find your blog most interesting and appreciate your ongoing effort to keep to the evidence for the issues discussed!"

-- Thomas L. Thompson, - April 2020
"I think you have a high quality blog that provides a positive public service by discussing academic topics within a wider audience."

— Russell Gmirkin, – October 2016
"Neil, You’ve done a clean job in your posting on ‘Jesus the Healer’. It reflects well on you. Best, John"

— John Moles, September 2011 (personal email)
"Note that I do not use the term ‘amateur’ pejoratively. . . . In fact, Godfrey is extremely well read and his librarian skills have brought many important academic works to my attention."

Raphael Lataster - August 2019
"By the way, my thanks to Neil for an ongoing superb job of exposing Jim’s review for what it is: a farcical and none too effective exercise in mythicism assassination, nothing to do with rational, let alone unbiased, scholarship. I’m also happy to see even Jim giving Neil credit where credit is due."

— Earl Doherty, June 2011
"Neil, this is actually rather useful. Good job."

— R. Joseph Hoffmann, – June 2014

Neil Godfrey on The Folly of Bayesian Probability in “Doing History”: “A troll is someone who ignores what is being said and continues their own agenda without engaging with the logic…” Dec 21, 03:26
Petr Jancar on The Folly of Bayesian Probability in “Doing History”: “I am still once more responding, so that you do not think that I am impolite or that I am…” Dec 20, 07:22
Neil Godfrey on The Folly of Bayesian Probability in “Doing History”: “I re-read my earlier reply and can see how you took it as “emotional” — but I can assure you…” Dec 18, 02:43
Neil Godfrey on The Folly of Bayesian Probability in “Doing History”: “I simply asked you to tell me what it is that you think I misunderstand or what, specifically, I am…” Dec 17, 20:26
Petr Jancar on The Folly of Bayesian Probability in “Doing History”: “Neil, I have no interest to engage in an emotional discussion. I felt indebted to you, since I read many…” Dec 17, 19:21
Neil Godfrey on The Folly of Bayesian Probability in “Doing History”: “Why do you ask? What are you trying to argue? I agree and acknowledge that Bayes theorem is a valid…” Dec 16, 09:22
Petr Jancar on The Folly of Bayesian Probability in “Doing History”: “My sentence “I voice several assumptions, testing if we all agree on them:” was meant as a yes/no question; let…” Dec 16, 08:57
Clarke W Owens on Is Everything a Question of Probability?: “Well, the distinction between “public knowledge” and the knowledge of professional researchers is not always crystal clear. For example, western…” Dec 15, 22:34
Neil Godfrey on Is Everything a Question of Probability?: “I spoke of public knowledge but afterwards wondered if I missed your point. You may have been thinking of knowledge…” Dec 15, 22:05

Neil Godfrey

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Share this:

Like this:

7 thoughts on “Assange”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Discover more from Vridar