2010-10-12

What’s the difference between a racist and an anti-creationist?

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

Albie Sachs

I have just had the privilege of listening to an interview with South Africa’s eminent Justice and renowned campaigner for justice in apartheid South Africa, Albie Sachs. I recommend the interview to every one who aspires to a more civil and humane society. He woke up after someone tried to kill him with a bomb and was euphoric that he had only lost an arm. He later met and shook hands with the man who planted that bomb to kill him.

Albie Sachs came from a family that knew the Jew-murdering pogroms in Lithuania. He has always stood against racism and every form of discrimination and marginalization of minorities. I was impressed with his insights even to the positive contributions made by the tiny communist parties in South Africa and elsewhere.

We abhor the mocking of the physically handicapped. We hate racism. We protest against the discrimination against women. We now advocate for respect for gays. We demand rights and respect for all humanity.

But some of our public intellectuals, ironically even those who profess to be both public intellectuals and Christians, are not the least bothered by despising, publicly mocking, marginalizing, denigrating and slandering those who think differently from the way they do.

I am not a public intellectual but have had the benefit of a good formal education with some wonderful intellectual guides, and opportunities to learn much since. I have never “attacked” (or if I have I have regretted it) Christians or even Christianity or fundamentalists or those who believe in Atlantis or psychic phenomena or UFOs etc, but I have engaged many adherents of these in forthright and civil discussions. They deserve to be heard because they are not inciting hatred and are sincere. I was once a fundamentalist and anti-evolutionist myself, so I am in no position to ridicule anyone for the ideas they hold.

The noble thing about intellectuals like Richard Dawkins and Jerry Coyne  and Michael Shermer is their ability to address creationist or intelligent design arguments — and therefore creationists themselves — with respect. They listen to what creationists say. Carefully. And they respond with civility and directness. Where they have found dishonesty, as verified in some cases by court-tested evidence, they have aired this information, too. They show how one can do that without adding unwarranted sneers or name-calling.

Yet some public intellectuals in the field of biblical studies — those who call themselves “Christians” even — have demonstrated the same sorts of ignorance and bigotry against those who challenge their arguments and assumptions as were once commonly directed against the physically handicapped, different races, gays, women. Example, against “Christ myth” arguments.

These public intellectuals also incite public disrespect, even saying that certain people don’t deserve to be listened to because of their different views about an intellectual topic of which they regard themselves the public guardians. This is not how evolutionary scientists defend science against creationists.

Public intellectuals have a responsibility to promote a civil society (meaning civil discourse at all levels) and intellectual integrity. There are too many New Testament scholars who fail dismally in both responsibilities. Even one is too many.

The following two tabs change content below.

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!

  • 2010-10-12 13:27:16 GMT+0000 - 13:27 | Permalink

    Since posting the above I have since discovered that one person who professes to be both an intellectual and a Christian has linked to a post of mine asserting it argues a point I nowhere make, have never made, and that contradicts the very explanation I give for making the post in that post itself.

    This is the sort of level to which some academics stoop in their bigoted inability to even read or grasp a particular point expressed, presumably because of their uncivil and disrespectful predispositions towards any person holding a view that challenges their assumptions and beliefs.

    One might almost wonder if there is a desperate effort to deflect attention from being exposed for his own intellectual shortcomings by spreading aggressive disinformation about others in preference to honest debate.

  • 2010-10-12 19:59:48 GMT+0000 - 19:59 | Permalink

    Damn. I get home this evening to find that about 20 clicks to a biblical apologist’s site and not one to the one really worth while listening to — the Albie Sach’s interview! 🙁

    Never mind, maybe everyone who bothers to glance at a blog like this one is already civil enough! 🙂

    • pearl
      2010-10-13 04:23:08 GMT+0000 - 04:23 | Permalink

      Neil, thank you for the link to the thoughtful interview.

      Oh, and some of us in another part of the world were not clickin’ earlier because we were sleepin’.

      Just sayin’. 😉

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.