2007-04-08

Link fixed – Formal debate: The Historical Resurrection of Jesus?

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

[Link is dead. If anyone has a copy of the original discussion please let me know. Thanks. — Neil Godfrey, 20th July, 2019]

Formal Debate “The Historical Resurrection of Jesus?”

“This thread is for the formal debate between Bible Defender and stevencarrwork. No other forum users are allowed to post in this thread, other than moderators or admins, until the formal debate is concluded.”

The following two tabs change content below.
Bio
Latest Posts

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

On Internet Censorship and Mainstream Propaganda, Substance and Image in Domestic and International Political Power - 2020-11-26 23:43:41 GMT+0000

Gospels Cut from Jewish Scriptures, #6 - 2020-11-25 12:12:41 GMT+0000

Gospels Cut from Jewish Scriptures, #5 - 2020-11-24 14:35:35 GMT+0000

Share this:
Tweet
Email
Like this:
Like Loading...

Related Posts on Vridar

If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!

Author Neil GodfreyPosted on 2007-04-08 21:24:55 GMT+00002019-07-20 01:30:34 GMT+0000Categories Biblical Studies, New TestamentTags Resurrection of Jesus

0 thoughts on “Link fixed – Formal debate: The Historical Resurrection of Jesus?”

Steven Carr says:

2007-04-09 06:23:09 GMT+0000 at 06:23

Gosh, I am very flattered that you think it is worthy of a link.

Loading...

Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment
Name *

Email *

Website

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.

Current ye@r *

Leave this field empty

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Post navigation

Previous post: Digest parody: Gospel of Judas / Archer, Moloney
Next post: Gospel of Judas (Archer/Moloney) fantasy verses

What they say about Vridar

“Neil, this is actually rather useful. Good job.”

— R. Joseph Hoffmann, – June 2014

I find your blog most interesting and appreciate your ongoing effort to keep to the evidence for the issues discussed!

— Thomas L. Thompson, – April 2020

“Here I give an admittedly subjective short list, in random order, of useful, high level and regularly updated weblogs on the study of the Old Testament . . . ‘Vridar: Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science’ (http://vridar.org/) by Neil Godfrey”

— Klaas Spronk, – Bibliotheca Orientalis LXXI, 3/4 (2014)

“I think you have a high quality blog that provides a positive public service by discussing academic topics within a wider audience.”

— Russell Gmirkin, – October 2016

“For an excellent example of generally high-quality scholarship by someone who isn’t a biblical studies professor, see Neil Godfrey’s work posted on the website vridar.org.”

— Tom Dykstra, – JOCABS 2015

“These reviews of yours are so bloody weird!”

— James Crossley, – April 2010

“I always enjoy reading Neil’s blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest.”

— April DeConick, – November 2007

“Neil, You’ve done a clean job in your posting on ‘Jesus the Healer’. It reflects well on you. Best, John”

— John Moles, September 2011 (personal email)

“Thanks for this detailed interaction! I’ll try to offer something more substantial than “Thank you” in response at some point, but I didn’t want to wait . . . to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what I’ve written!”

— James McGrath, – June 2009

Thanks much for this book review. I think it expands, and contributes to, the effort in honouring Thomas that we with Lukasz originally had in mind with this volume. Best, Emanuel

— Emanuel Pfoh – August 2020

“Neil Godfrey and Tim Widowfield, who both write at Vridar . . . happen to be some of the most astute and well-read amateurs you can read on the internet on the subject of biblical historicity. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they don’t have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. But I have often been impressed with their grasp of logic and analysis of scholarship. I don’t always agree with them, but I respect their work.”

— Richard Carrier, – March 2014

“Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on.”

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019

“Thanks for your very elaborate review! I realized that I hadn’t added your blog to our blogroll. This oversight has been corrected. Looking forward to more segments.”

— Anthony Le Donne, – September 2009

“I’d like to thank you for this very nice representation of what I was trying to show in the book. It’s always gratifying when a reader zeroes in on exactly those aspects I thought were most interesting and most central to my argument. Thank you for this careful and engaged reading of my work – much appreciated!”

— Eva Mroczek, – June 2017

“I’ve even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really don’t know how to take, so thanks, I think, but I’m not sure, Vrider (even though I feel like I need to take a shower now)).”

— Jim West, – September 2010

“I have found your website really valuable as an interpretive filter for Biblical scholarship, especially the origins of Christianity and historicity of Jesus issue. Your clarity of expression, fair comments and personal insights are much valued. I refer to your site frequently as yet more names and publications pop up requiring an academic critique and helpful recommendations for book purchases. So, please continue to delve deeply and share this intellectual sustenance with your grateful readers.”

— Mary Booker, – February 2020 (personal email)

Fantastic. I’m so glad you’re helping to spread these ideas!

Nancy Fraser – June 2019 (personal email)

“Very good. This post is going straight to the March 2016 Biblical Studies Carnival.”

—N.T. Wrong, – March 2016

Note that I do not use the term ‘amateur’ pejoratively. . . . In fact, Godfrey is extremely well read and his librarian skills have brought many important academic works to my attention.

Raphael Lataster – August 2019

“I want to say here that this site is so resourceful and highly on top of the most modern scholarship in the areas discussed here. . . I know of no other site which offers a wide range of topics related to careful critical analysis of historically and scripturally related issues.”

— Martin Lewadny, – March 2009

I still wonder at all the material you turn out for Vridar. The more I read your stuff (and I still do, of course), the more I realize how much we all owe you. Your voice is unique.

— Earl Doherty, November 2013 (personal email)

“Neil, for what it is worth it is obvious to me that if you had earlier in life tracked into a graduate program at one of the world’s leading research universities you would be one of the world’s formidable ones. You are doing essentially the same quality now (apart from the philology and languages) except mostly sticking to commenting on others’ work as informed comment/discussion.”

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019

“Many thanks for this post, and for the quality of your blog.“

— Philippe Wajdenbaum, – November 2018

By the way, my thanks to Neil for an ongoing superb job of exposing Jim’s review for what it is: a farcical and none too effective exercise in mythicism assassination, nothing to do with rational, let alone unbiased, scholarship. I’m also happy to see even Jim giving Neil credit where credit is due.

— Earl Doherty, June 2011

Search Vridar

Search for:

Categories
Categories

Subscribe to Vridar

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address

Follow Vridar on Facebook

Follow Vridar on Facebook

Vridar.org’s Sister Site
vridar.info
Pages

Thank You!

ABOUT VRIDAR: Authors’ profiles (updated 14th March 2019)

What Is Vridar? (updated 19th December 2016)

Contact info

Comments and moderation (updated 21st Jan 2018)

Permissions: mine and yours

WHO’s WHO: Mythicists, Mythicist Agnostics & Historicists Who Call for Scholarly Debate (Updated 6th August 2020)

HISTORICAL METHOD and the Question of Christian Origins

ARCHIVES by TOPIC, Annotated (Updated 20 May 2020)

“Born of a Woman” / Galatians 4:4 INDEX

“Rulers of this Age” in 1 Cor. 2:6-8

Billionaire Logic and the Death of JFK

Christ Among the Messiahs (Novenson)

Daniel Gullotta’s Review of Richard Carrier’s On the Historicity of Jesus

Death and Resurrection of the Beloved Son (Levenson)

Emmaus Road / Cleopas Posts

Ending of the Gospel of Mark (16:8) — ANNOTATED INDEX

From Adapa to Enoch (Sanders)

Genre of Gospels, Acts and OT Primary History: INDEX

Historical Methods (with reference to the study of Christian Origins/Historicity of Jesus)

Jesus in Josephus: Testimonium Flavianum

Nazareth

Plato and the Hebrew Bible (Gmirkin)

OTHER AUTHORS

Earl Doherty’s posts

Earl Doherty’s response to Bart Ehrman‘s Did Jesus Exist?

Earl Doherty’s response to James McGrath‘s “review” of JNGNM & other criticisms (& misc)

Roger Parvus: Letters Supposedly Written by Ignatius

Roger Parvus: A Simonian Origin for Christianity

Samuel Sandmel’s article, “Parallelomania” (1962)

Rationalist-atheist links

Response to ADL propaganda, “Major Attacks Against Israel”

Palestinian news sources

Subscription Page

Recent Comments
Neil Godfrey on On Internet Censorship and Mainstream Propaganda, Substance and Image in Domestic and International Political Power: “Ah yes. The interview raised several questions that challenged some of the views I had been leaning towards. It is…” Nov 29, 21:51
James on On Internet Censorship and Mainstream Propaganda, Substance and Image in Domestic and International Political Power: “The 1) internet overall might be neutral. But 2) as its own business, somewhat like a newspaper editorial, Facebook might…” Nov 29, 21:29
James on On Internet Censorship and Mainstream Propaganda, Substance and Image in Domestic and International Political Power: “Well, academic articles don’t take sides, so I guess that’s good. Though I’ve been in politics lately. And admit to…” Nov 29, 21:17
db on Did Jonathan Z. Smith Really Not Understand Ideal Types? (Part 1): “• “Jonathan Z. Smith, Drudgery Divine”. depts.drew.edu. “Reviewed by Robert M. Price. Institute for Higher Critical Studies JHC 3/1 (Spring,…” Nov 29, 16:12
db on “In the name of God, let Palestine be left alone.”: “the Jewish state is an injustice Somebody needs to coin a term for this Zionist colonial project. Perhaps: anthropoblivionism.” Nov 29, 09:55
db on Did Jonathan Z. Smith Really Not Understand Ideal Types? (Part 1): “As a side note: Cook, contra Smith, asserts that “the continued use of the category of dying and rising gods”…” Nov 29, 08:45
RoHa on “In the name of God, let Palestine be left alone.”: ““We must expropriate gently the private property on the estates assigned to us. We shall try to spirit the penniless…” Nov 29, 07:55
RoHa on “In the name of God, let Palestine be left alone.”: “Probably not. This shows that the Jewish state is an injustice.” Nov 29, 07:51
db on On Internet Censorship and Mainstream Propaganda, Substance and Image in Domestic and International Political Power: “for a platform to be a “content-neutral” As I understand this concept needs to be split into two categories: 1)…” Nov 29, 04:07

Recent Posts

On Internet Censorship and Mainstream Propaganda, Substance and Image in Domestic and International Political Power 2020-11-26 23:43:41 GMT+0000

Did Jonathan Z. Smith Really Not Understand Ideal Types? (Part 1) 2020-11-25 23:58:08 GMT+0000

Gospels Cut from Jewish Scriptures, #6 2020-11-25 12:12:41 GMT+0000

Gospels Cut from Jewish Scriptures, #5 2020-11-24 14:35:35 GMT+0000

Petition for Australian readers re David McBride 2020-11-24 08:51:10 GMT+0000

Propaganda Today: New Targets and Deflections 2020-11-23 10:30:43 GMT+0000

A Vridar Error with Apologies and Corrections 2020-11-23 09:26:11 GMT+0000

“In the name of God, let Palestine be left alone.” 2020-11-21 09:37:52 GMT+0000

Understanding Historical Evidence 2020-11-20 11:02:19 GMT+0000

What Caused the Jewish War of 66-74 CE? 2020-11-19 14:53:21 GMT+0000

Interlude: Why I Doubt the Historical Existence of Jesus 2020-11-17 07:20:13 GMT+0000

Bad History for Atheists (4) — Psychoanalyzing Dissenters 2020-11-16 05:19:45 GMT+0000

Bad History for Atheists (3) — Proof-texting, Circularity, Fake Facts, Insults 2020-11-15 08:26:35 GMT+0000

Bad History for Atheists (2) — Troubles Reading the Sources and Engaging with Different Viewpoints 2020-11-14 06:31:20 GMT+0000

Bad History for Atheists (1) — Louis Feldman on Justin’s Trypho and “proving Jesus existed” 2020-11-13 23:06:36 GMT+0000

Comparing the Honesty of Fox News with the Honesty of Benjamin Franklin’s Press? 2020-11-11 22:32:38 GMT+0000

Robert Fisk, 1946-2020 2020-11-10 20:26:04 GMT+0000

Such Relief 2020-11-08 07:00:48 GMT+0000

“The coming weeks and months will be the most dangerous period of this presidency” 2020-11-05 22:00:34 GMT+0000

Escape Zone (enter here to escape the tensions of waiting for election results) 2020-11-04 11:16:36 GMT+0000

Most-Used Tags

Acts of the Apostles

Ancient historians

Australia

Bart Ehrman

Bauckham: Jesus and the Eyewitnesses

Biblical Scholarship

Brodie: Beyond the Quest for the Historical Jesus

Christianity

Christian Origins

Christ Myth Debate

Christ Myth Debate: Doherty

Criteria of Authenticity

Doherty: Jesus Neither God Nor Man

Earl Doherty

Epistles

Exchanges with McGrath

Fundamentalism

God and Other Deities

Gospel of John

Gospel of Luke

Gospel of Mark

Gospel of Matthew

Gospels

Gospels and Acts (Canonical)

Historical Jesus

Historical Method

Intertextuality

Islam

Israel

Israel-Palestine

James McGrath

Josephus

Marcion

Maurice Casey

Paul

Paul and his letters

Richard Bauckham

Richard Carrier

Robert M. Price

Roger Parvus

Terrorism

Thomas Brodie

Trump

USA

Vridar blog

Archives
Archives
Calendar
April 2007

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30

« Mar May »
Meta

Log in

Entries feed

Comments feed

WordPress.org