2007-04-08

Link fixed – Formal debate: The Historical Resurrection of Jesus?

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

[Link is dead. If anyone has a copy of the original discussion please let me know. Thanks. — Neil Godfrey, 20th July, 2019]

Formal Debate “The Historical Resurrection of Jesus?”

“This thread is for the formal debate between Bible Defender and stevencarrwork. No other forum users are allowed to post in this thread, other than moderators or admins, until the formal debate is concluded.”

The following two tabs change content below.
Bio
Latest Posts

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Bearing False Witness for Jesus - 2022-01-18 01:12:46 GMT+0000

Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear? - 2022-01-17 05:02:14 GMT+0000

Nero – Followup #2 - 2022-01-15 12:17:08 GMT+0000

Share this:
Tweet
Email
Like this:
Like Loading...

Related Posts on Vridar

If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!

Author Neil GodfreyPosted on 2007-04-08 21:24:55 GMT+00002019-07-20 01:30:34 GMT+0000Categories Biblical Studies, New TestamentTags Resurrection of Jesus

One thought on “Link fixed – Formal debate: The Historical Resurrection of Jesus?”

Steven Carr says:

2007-04-09 06:23:09 GMT+0000 at 06:23

Gosh, I am very flattered that you think it is worthy of a link.

Loading...

Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment
Name *

Email *

Website

Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email.

Current ye@r *

Leave this field empty

Δ

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Post navigation

Previous post: Digest parody: Gospel of Judas / Archer, Moloney
Next post: Gospel of Judas (Archer/Moloney) fantasy verses

What they say about Vridar
"I think you have a high quality blog that provides a positive public service by discussing academic topics within a wider audience."

— Russell Gmirkin, – October 2016

"Thanks much for this book review. I think it expands, and contributes to, the effort in honouring Thomas that we with Lukasz originally had in mind with this volume. Best, Emanuel"

-- Emanuel Pfoh - August 2020

"Note that I do not use the term ‘amateur’ pejoratively. . . . In fact, Godfrey is extremely well read and his librarian skills have brought many important academic works to my attention."

Raphael Lataster - August 2019

"I still wonder at all the material you turn out for Vridar. The more I read your stuff (and I still do, of course), the more I realize how much we all owe you. Your voice is unique."

— Earl Doherty, November 2013 (personal email)

"Many thanks for this post, and for the quality of your blog."

— Philippe Wajdenbaum, – November 2018

"I find your blog most interesting and appreciate your ongoing effort to keep to the evidence for the issues discussed!"

-- Thomas L. Thompson, - April 2020

"Very good. This post is going straight to the March 2016 Biblical Studies Carnival."

—N.T. Wrong, – March 2016

"I always enjoy reading Neil’s blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest."

— April DeConick, – November 2007

"Thanks for this detailed interaction! I’ll try to offer something more substantial than 'Thank you' in response at some point, but I didn’t want to wait . . . to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what I’ve written!"

— James McGrath, – June 2009

"By the way, my thanks to Neil for an ongoing superb job of exposing Jim’s review for what it is: a farcical and none too effective exercise in mythicism assassination, nothing to do with rational, let alone unbiased, scholarship. I’m also happy to see even Jim giving Neil credit where credit is due."

— Earl Doherty, June 2011

"Fantastic. I’m so glad you’re helping to spread these ideas!"

Nancy Fraser - June 2019 (personal email)

"Thanks for your very elaborate review! I realized that I hadn’t added your blog to our blogroll. This oversight has been corrected. Looking forward to more segments."

— Anthony Le Donne, – September 2009

"Neil, You’ve done a clean job in your posting on ‘Jesus the Healer’. It reflects well on you. Best, John"

— John Moles, September 2011 (personal email)

"Here I give an admittedly subjective short list, in random order, of useful, high level and regularly updated weblogs on the study of the Old Testament . . . ‘Vridar: Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science’ (http://vridar.org/) by Neil Godfrey"

-- Klaas Spronk, - Bibliotheca Orientalis LXXI, 3/4 (2014)

"Neil Godfrey and Tim Widowfield, who both write at Vridar . . . happen to be some of the most astute and well-read amateurs you can read on the internet on the subject of biblical historicity. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they don’t have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. But I have often been impressed with their grasp of logic and analysis of scholarship. I don’t always agree with them, but I respect their work."

— Richard Carrier, – March 2014

"These reviews of yours are so bloody weird!"

— James Crossley, – April 2010

"Neil, this is actually rather useful. Good job."

— R. Joseph Hoffmann, – June 2014

"I want to say here that this site is so resourceful and highly on top of the most modern scholarship in the areas discussed here. . . I know of no other site which offers a wide range of topics related to careful critical analysis of historically and scripturally related issues."

-- Martin Lewadny, - March 2009

"I’ve even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really don’t know how to take, so thanks, I think, but I’m not sure, Vrider (even though I feel like I need to take a shower now))."

-- Jim West, – September 2010

"I’d like to thank you for this very nice representation of what I was trying to show in the book. It’s always gratifying when a reader zeroes in on exactly those aspects I thought were most interesting and most central to my argument. Thank you for this careful and engaged reading of my work – much appreciated!"

— Eva Mroczek, – June 2017

"I have found your website really valuable as an interpretive filter for Biblical scholarship, especially the origins of Christianity and historicity of Jesus issue. Your clarity of expression, fair comments and personal insights are much valued. I refer to your site frequently as yet more names and publications pop up requiring an academic critique and helpful recommendations for book purchases. So, please continue to delve deeply and share this intellectual sustenance with your grateful readers."

— Mary Booker, – February 2020 (personal email)

"Neil, for what it is worth it is obvious to me that if you had earlier in life tracked into a graduate program at one of the world’s leading research universities you would be one of the world’s formidable ones. You are doing essentially the same quality now (apart from the philology and languages) except mostly sticking to commenting on others’ work as informed comment/discussion."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019

"Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019

"For an excellent example of generally high-quality scholarship by someone who isn’t a biblical studies professor, see Neil Godfrey’s work posted on the website vridar.org."

— Tom Dykstra, – JOCABS 2015

Search Vridar

Search for:

Categories
Categories

Subscribe to Vridar

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address

Follow Vridar on Facebook

Follow Vridar on Facebook

Vridar.org’s Sister Site
vridar.info
Pages

ABOUT VRIDAR: Authors’ profiles (updated 14th March 2019)

What Is Vridar? (updated 19th December 2016)

Contact info

Comments and moderation (updated 21st Jan 2018)

Permissions: mine and yours

BRUNO BAUER: Criticism of the Gospels and History of their Origin – in English

HISTORICAL METHOD and the Question of Christian Origins

Jésus-Christ, sublime figure de papier / Nanine Charbonnel

WHO’s WHO: Mythicists, Mythicist Agnostics & Historicists Who Call for Scholarly Debate (Updated 6th August 2020)

ARCHIVES by TOPIC, Annotated (Updated 20 May 2020)

“Born of a Woman” / Galatians 4:4 INDEX

“Rulers of this Age” in 1 Cor. 2:6-8

Billionaire Logic and the Death of JFK

Christ Among the Messiahs (Novenson)

Daniel Gullotta’s Review of Richard Carrier’s On the Historicity of Jesus

Death and Resurrection of the Beloved Son (Levenson)

Emmaus Road / Cleopas Posts

Ending of the Gospel of Mark (16:8) — ANNOTATED INDEX

From Adapa to Enoch (Sanders)

Genre of Gospels, Acts and OT Primary History: INDEX

Historical Methods (with reference to the study of Christian Origins/Historicity of Jesus)

Jesus in Josephus: Testimonium Flavianum

Nazareth

Plato and the Hebrew Bible (Gmirkin)

OTHER AUTHORS

Earl Doherty’s posts

Earl Doherty’s response to Bart Ehrman‘s Did Jesus Exist?

Earl Doherty’s response to James McGrath‘s “review” of JNGNM & other criticisms (& misc)

Roger Parvus: Letters Supposedly Written by Ignatius

Roger Parvus: A Simonian Origin for Christianity

Samuel Sandmel’s article, “Parallelomania” (1962)

Rationalist-atheist links

Response to ADL propaganda, “Major Attacks Against Israel”

Palestinian news sources

Subscription Page

Recent Comments
RoHa on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “Hold on! Are you trying to tell us that Heracles wasn’t real?” Jan 20, 05:41
Kelly Wellington on Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear?: “Interesting. I like your inclusion of Marcion in the mix, as I’m of the opinion that his meddling set a…” Jan 20, 02:20
Danila on Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear?: “Yes, the model of Sabbatai Ṣevi does apply to the supposed historical Jesus. We should see texts including creative writing…” Jan 20, 00:48
Mark on Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear?: “https://www.jstor.org/stable/24433089 Surely some lawyer somewhere has been struck by one loose thread in the official biography of Jesus Christ, the…” Jan 19, 23:09
Peter on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “John Dickson’s claim that “historical Jesus” existed is Equivocation Fallacy. When he talks about the Jesus he believes in, Jesus…” Jan 19, 19:43
MrHorse on Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear?: “The ultimate desolation of Jerusalem happened after the 2nd Roman-Jewish War, the Bar Kochba Revolt of the early 130s CE,…” Jan 19, 06:03
db on Bearing False Witness for Jesus: “OP: “[A] National Church Life Survey found that only 49% of Australians believe that ‘Jesus was a real person who…” Jan 19, 01:22
Mark on Rome Burning – the Christian Problem in the Annals of Tacitus: “Avalos’ main thesis is that “The ideas of health care reflected in early Christianity constitute a system that was an…” Jan 18, 21:35
Mark on Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear?: “The tradition of the hadith (prophet’s sayings and doings) and other historical works about the birth of Islam were only…” Jan 18, 21:24

Recent Posts

Bearing False Witness for Jesus 2022-01-18 01:12:46 GMT+0000

Why Did Written Stories of Jesus Take So Long to Appear? 2022-01-17 05:02:14 GMT+0000

Nero – Followup #2 2022-01-15 12:17:08 GMT+0000

Nero – the Followup: Reviews of Barrett’s Discussion of the Neronian Persecution 2022-01-15 09:12:30 GMT+0000

Rome Burning – the Christian Problem in the Annals of Tacitus 2022-01-13 14:55:18 GMT+0000

Rome Burning – Difficulties with the Tacitus Passage 2022-01-11 11:17:40 GMT+0000

Rome Burning — and the Christians: A New Study 2022-01-10 21:48:19 GMT+0000

After the Transfiguration of Jesus — Some Lesser Known Allusions to Moses 2022-01-05 23:38:48 GMT+0000

What’s a lonely Jesus to do? 2022-01-04 23:52:09 GMT+0000

The Fairy Tale Ideal World of the Gospel Story as a Living Hell 2022-01-03 14:01:47 GMT+0000

The Intelligence Trap: Why Smart People Make Dumb Mistakes 2022-01-02 23:47:55 GMT+0000

A Common Origin – One Wonders 2022-01-01 11:27:06 GMT+0000

Sermon on the Mount – Bruno Bauer update 2021-12-31 08:41:30 GMT+0000

Further updates 2021-12-23 21:53:37 GMT+0000

From Hermes to Yahweh 2021-12-21 22:19:37 GMT+0000

Updates – Late gospels and Josephus’s guilt-inspired prophecy 2021-12-20 10:43:38 GMT+0000

On Charity and Tyrants 2021-12-18 22:01:21 GMT+0000

New Thoughts on Christian Origins 2021-12-17 13:38:17 GMT+0000

Where none shall hunger 2021-12-09 23:28:54 GMT+0000

The Big Question We Should Be Asking of Human History 2021-12-06 22:51:36 GMT+0000

Most-Used Tags

Acts of the Apostles

Australia

Bart Ehrman

Bauckham: Jesus and the Eyewitnesses

Biblical Scholarship

Charbonnel: Jesus Christ sublime figure de papier

Christianity

Christian Origins

Christ Myth Debate

Christ Myth Debate: Doherty

Criteria of Authenticity

Doherty: Jesus Neither God Nor Man

Earl Doherty

Epistles

Exchanges with McGrath

Fundamentalism

God and Other Deities

Gospel of John

Gospel of Luke

Gospel of Mark

Gospel of Matthew

Gospels

Gospels and Acts (Canonical)

Historical Jesus

Historical Method

Intertextuality

Islam

Israel-Palestine

James McGrath

John the Baptist

Josephus

Marcion

Maurice Casey

Midrash

Paul

Paul and his letters

Richard Bauckham

Richard Carrier

Robert M. Price

Roger Parvus

Terrorism

Thomas Brodie

Trump

USA

Vridar blog

Archives
Archives
Calendar
April 2007

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30

« Mar May »
Meta

Log in

Entries feed

Comments feed

WordPress.org