2007-04-08

Digest parody: Gospel of Judas / Archer, Moloney

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

Loved this digest parody of the Archer – Moloney ‘Gospel of Judas’:

Check out John Crace’s “digested read” at the Guardian website.

The Guardian also has a more serious review here.

Bio
Latest Posts

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Imagining an Alternative to Human Rights - 2022-08-09 13:17:59 GMT+0000
“Some Underlying Tradition” — a review of Writing With Scripture, part 10 - 2022-08-06 14:23:27 GMT+0000
How (and Why) Jewish Scriptures are used in Mark’s Passion Narrative — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 9 - 2022-08-05 18:30:35 GMT+0000

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

"By the way, my thanks to Neil for an ongoing superb job of exposing Jim’s review for what it is: a farcical and none too effective exercise in mythicism assassination, nothing to do with rational, let alone unbiased, scholarship. I’m also happy to see even Jim giving Neil credit where credit is due."

— Earl Doherty, June 2011
"Thanks for this detailed interaction! I’ll try to offer something more substantial than 'Thank you' in response at some point, but I didn’t want to wait . . . to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what I’ve written!"

— James McGrath, – June 2009
"Neil, You’ve done a clean job in your posting on ‘Jesus the Healer’. It reflects well on you. Best, John"

— John Moles, September 2011 (personal email)
"Thanks for your very elaborate review! I realized that I hadn’t added your blog to our blogroll. This oversight has been corrected. Looking forward to more segments."

— Anthony Le Donne, – September 2009
"I still wonder at all the material you turn out for Vridar. The more I read your stuff (and I still do, of course), the more I realize how much we all owe you. Your voice is unique."

— Earl Doherty, November 2013 (personal email)
"I’d like to thank you for this very nice representation of what I was trying to show in the book. It’s always gratifying when a reader zeroes in on exactly those aspects I thought were most interesting and most central to my argument. Thank you for this careful and engaged reading of my work – much appreciated!"

— Eva Mroczek, – June 2017
"These reviews of yours are so bloody weird!"

— James Crossley, – April 2010
"I find your blog most interesting and appreciate your ongoing effort to keep to the evidence for the issues discussed!"

-- Thomas L. Thompson, - April 2020
"Fantastic. I’m so glad you’re helping to spread these ideas!"

Nancy Fraser - June 2019 (personal email)
"Note that I do not use the term ‘amateur’ pejoratively. . . . In fact, Godfrey is extremely well read and his librarian skills have brought many important academic works to my attention."

Raphael Lataster - August 2019
"Here I give an admittedly subjective short list, in random order, of useful, high level and regularly updated weblogs on the study of the Old Testament . . . ‘Vridar: Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science’ (http://vridar.org/) by Neil Godfrey"

-- Klaas Spronk, - Bibliotheca Orientalis LXXI, 3/4 (2014)
"Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"I have found your website really valuable as an interpretive filter for Biblical scholarship, especially the origins of Christianity and historicity of Jesus issue. Your clarity of expression, fair comments and personal insights are much valued. I refer to your site frequently as yet more names and publications pop up requiring an academic critique and helpful recommendations for book purchases. So, please continue to delve deeply and share this intellectual sustenance with your grateful readers."

— Mary Booker, – February 2020 (personal email)
"Many thanks for this post, and for the quality of your blog."

— Philippe Wajdenbaum, – November 2018
"I want to say here that this site is so resourceful and highly on top of the most modern scholarship in the areas discussed here. . . I know of no other site which offers a wide range of topics related to careful critical analysis of historically and scripturally related issues."

-- Martin Lewadny, - March 2009
"Neil, this is actually rather useful. Good job."

— R. Joseph Hoffmann, – June 2014
"Thanks much for this book review. I think it expands, and contributes to, the effort in honouring Thomas that we with Lukasz originally had in mind with this volume. Best, Emanuel"

-- Emanuel Pfoh - August 2020
"Neil, for what it is worth it is obvious to me that if you had earlier in life tracked into a graduate program at one of the world’s leading research universities you would be one of the world’s formidable ones. You are doing essentially the same quality now (apart from the philology and languages) except mostly sticking to commenting on others’ work as informed comment/discussion."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"I always enjoy reading Neil’s blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest."

— April DeConick, – November 2007
"I think you have a high quality blog that provides a positive public service by discussing academic topics within a wider audience."

— Russell Gmirkin, – October 2016
"I’ve even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really don’t know how to take, so thanks, I think, but I’m not sure, Vrider (even though I feel like I need to take a shower now))."

-- Jim West, – September 2010
"Very good. This post is going straight to the March 2016 Biblical Studies Carnival."

—N.T. Wrong, – March 2016
"For an excellent example of generally high-quality scholarship by someone who isn’t a biblical studies professor, see Neil Godfrey’s work posted on the website vridar.org."

— Tom Dykstra, – JOCABS 2015
"Neil Godfrey and Tim Widowfield, who both write at Vridar . . . happen to be some of the most astute and well-read amateurs you can read on the internet on the subject of biblical historicity. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they don’t have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. But I have often been impressed with their grasp of logic and analysis of scholarship. I don’t always agree with them, but I respect their work."

— Richard Carrier, – March 2014

Neil Godfrey on How (and Why) Jewish Scriptures are used in Mark’s Passion Narrative — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 9: “Thanks for this feedback, Geoff. Yes, the ritual-myth connection is one that has fascinated me since reading some studies about…” Aug 10, 23:37
Neil Godfrey on Imagining an Alternative to Human Rights: “Understood. I have to confess I don’t know how much they lost of their original thoughts when they used the…” Aug 10, 15:42
Gary Walsh on Imagining an Alternative to Human Rights: “It is interesting that your companions divided people into “good” and “bad”. This seems to imply that these are inherent…” Aug 10, 15:22
James Faubel on Miscellany: “Do you really believe Philo was ignorant of astrological information? Clearly (at least to me) the two main sources for…” Aug 10, 00:42
James Faubel on Nero – Followup #2: “I think Nero was vilified long after his death. Need anyone to be reminded that it is the Victors who…” Aug 10, 00:06
James Faubel on New Thoughts on Christian Origins: “Have we forgotten that so much of “Hellenistic Judaism” came from Egypt as well as Jewish communities (called “Jewish mercenaries)…” Aug 9, 23:50
Geoff Sankey on How (and Why) Jewish Scriptures are used in Mark’s Passion Narrative — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 9: “Thank you Neil. This is a most thought provoking piece of writing, which I have benefited from reading several times.…” Aug 9, 20:59
TW on Imagining an Alternative to Human Rights: “What can you do? China is a fascist state; no news there.” Aug 9, 13:29
db on How (and Why) Jewish Scriptures are used in Mark’s Passion Narrative — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 9: “MILLER, RICHARD C. (2010). “Mark’s Empty Tomb and Other Translation Fables in Classical Antiquity”. Journal of Biblical Literature. 129 (4):…” Aug 9, 01:39

Recent Posts

Imagining an Alternative to Human Rights 2022-08-09 13:17:59 GMT+0000

“Some Underlying Tradition” — a review of Writing With Scripture, part 10 2022-08-06 14:23:27 GMT+0000

How (and Why) Jewish Scriptures are used in Mark’s Passion Narrative — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 9 2022-08-05 18:30:35 GMT+0000

Sidetracked though misadventure: Time to reflect 2022-07-30 05:13:10 GMT+0000

Clarification of the Thesis — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 8 2022-07-21 06:00:23 GMT+0000

How Queen Esther Influenced the Fate of John the Baptist — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 7 2022-07-18 08:50:16 GMT+0000

The Message of the Feeding Miracles of Jesus — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 6 2022-07-16 01:23:27 GMT+0000

Creating the Gospel of Mark — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 5 2022-07-14 02:20:48 GMT+0000

Creating Pseudo-History (and Comedy) from Scripture — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 4 2022-07-10 23:06:47 GMT+0000

To What Shall We Compare the Gospels? — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 3 2022-07-08 01:49:04 GMT+0000

Creating New Stories from Scripture — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 2 2022-07-06 04:20:34 GMT+0000

K. L. Schmidt’s “Framework” Part 1: Introduction — Duration and Timeline 2022-07-02 22:22:40 GMT+0000

A side-note on evidence for “scripturalized tradition” behind the gospels 2022-07-01 00:16:10 GMT+0000

How and Why the Gospel of Mark Used Scripture — a review of Writing with Scripture, part 1 2022-06-28 23:02:24 GMT+0000

The Two Witnesses in Revelation 11: the theories 2022-06-24 21:19:47 GMT+0000

Revelation 12: The Woman, the Child, the Dragon – Wellhausen’s view 2022-06-22 10:37:43 GMT+0000

Measuring the Temple in Revelation 11 – the Questions Arising 2022-06-20 22:36:35 GMT+0000

Simeon The Just: The Forgotten Author Of The Hebrew Bible 2022-06-16 23:32:25 GMT+0000

Isaiah Sawn in Two — Origin of the Story 2022-06-08 23:54:13 GMT+0000

The Pale Horse of the Apocalypse, Its Rider and Companion 2022-06-07 03:00:37 GMT+0000

Most-Used Tags

Acts of the Apostles

Australia

Bart Ehrman

Bauckham: Jesus and the Eyewitnesses

Biblical Scholarship

Charbonnel: Jesus Christ sublime figure de papier

Christianity

Christian Origins

Christ Myth Debate

Christ Myth Debate: Doherty

Criteria of Authenticity

Doherty: Jesus Neither God Nor Man

Earl Doherty

Epistles

Exchanges with McGrath

Fundamentalism

God and Other Deities

Gospel of John

Gospel of Luke

Gospel of Mark

Gospel of Matthew

Gospels

Gospels and Acts (Canonical)

Historical Jesus

Historical Method

Intertextuality

Islam

Israel-Palestine

James McGrath

John the Baptist

Josephus

Marcion

Maurice Casey

Midrash

Paul

Paul and his letters

Richard Bauckham

Richard Carrier

Robert M. Price

Roger Parvus

Terrorism

Thomas Brodie

Trump

USA

Vridar blog

Archives
Archives
Calendar
April 2007

S M T W T F S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30

« Mar May »
Meta

Log in

Entries feed

Comments feed

WordPress.org

2007-04-08

Digest parody: Gospel of Judas / Archer, Moloney

by Neil Godfrey

Neil Godfrey

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Like this:

Related Posts on Vridar

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Neil Godfrey

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Share this:

Like this:

Related Posts on Vridar

Leave a Comment Cancel reply