Search Results for: Boyarin

Who’s the scholarly scoundrel? Scholars of Christian origins bound by bias, immured in myth.

I disengaged from the question that was being asked, falling on the last resort of the scholarly scoundrel: “I’m just trying to figure out what really happened!” (Daniel Boyarin) Most of us [biblical scholars] are just trying to follow the evidence. (Larry Hurtado) . Forget mythicism or the Christ myth debate. That’s irrelevant. Or should … Continue reading “Who’s the scholarly scoundrel? Scholars of Christian origins bound by bias, immured in myth.”

Islam, the Untold Story

Updated about 4 hours after first posting — especially in the opening paragraphs of “The Arab conquests are FOLLOWED by the rise of Islam“. Historian and novelist Tom Holland raises some fascinating questions about the evidence pertaining to the origins of the Muslim religion. Is it possible that all three “religions of the book” will … Continue reading “Islam, the Untold Story”

The Myth of Disinterested Scholarly Research

I can understand laypersons indignantly jumping to the defence of their favourite biblical or historical Jesus researcher whenever the suggestion arises that any scholar inevitably succumbs to ideological and career pressures. When scholars themselves proclaim their pureness of heart disinterested approach to their research, however, we are witnessing the problem of self-deception. Tonight I was … Continue reading “The Myth of Disinterested Scholarly Research”

So some Jews did expect a suffering Messiah?

Before continuing with the second part of my previous post I’ll post here something unexpected that I read last night. Daniel Boyarin is Taubman Professor of Talmudic Culture and rhetoric at the University of California whose views on Christian origins are not unanimously welcomed by Christian theologians. I don’t know at this stage what to … Continue reading “So some Jews did expect a suffering Messiah?”

Goodacre-Carrier Debate: What if . . . . ?

I have finally caught up with the comments by Dr Mark Goodacre [MG] and Dr Richard Carrier [RC] since their radio discussion on the view that Jesus did not exist. While RC, without the burden of having to mark student papers, is able to add around 7,000 words of recap and elaboration to the case … Continue reading “Goodacre-Carrier Debate: What if . . . . ?”