[S]ound historical method must lead a scholar to distrust any source much of which can be shown to be false — unless truly reliable material exists outside that source as a check.
Sometimes, however, we find that a scholar writes history
on the principle that a historian can safely mine “nuggets” out of otherwise worthless ore.
Both quotations are from Chester G. Starr in “The Credibility of Early Spartan History”, (Historia: Zeitschrift fur Alte Geschichte Bd. 14, H. 3 (Jul., 1965), pp. 257-272) …. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4434883
Related Posts
Quest for History: Rule One — from Brodie’s Beyond the Quest for the Historical Jesus
Confusing “Narrative Voice” of Gospels with “Historical Truth Claims”. . . . Jesus, Criteria, and the Demise of Authenticity, ch. 2 final
Carrier’s “Proving History”, Chapter 2 — Review
The Positive Value of Scepticism — and Building a Negative Case — in Historical Enquiry- When Do Contemporary or Early Sources Matter in Ancient History?
How Historical Imagination Destroys the Gospels
2 Comments
Pingback: Vridar » Saul’s Folly: The King Can’t Be a Jack of All Trades
Pingback: Vridar » The evidence of ancient historians