Coincidentally with my own two posts Richard Carrier has been posting on two other reactions to the widening interest in questions about the historicity of Jesus. He takes the trouble to respond to James McGrath’s typically dishonest nonsense (this time against Raphael Lataster’s new book), and to respond point by point to John Tors’ reaction to Brian Bethune’s Macleans’ article.
.
On Stanley Porter’s reaction: Biblical Scholars Reacting to Public Interest in Mythicism: Part 1
On Philip Jenkins’ reaction: Biblical Scholars Reacting . . . Part 2
The following two tabs change content below.
Neil Godfrey
Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.
Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)
- The Throne of Satan in Revelation - 2022-05-24 07:32:49 GMT+0000
- The Doctrine of Balaam and the Nicolaitans - 2022-05-23 03:20:21 GMT+0000
- Miscellany - 2022-05-18 06:03:53 GMT+0000
If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!