One of the most interesting and informative books I have read about the gospels is one that is probably (and most unfortunately) not widely known among biblical scholars, at least not yet. It is a study of the gospels from the perspective of literary criticism. Clarke W. Owens shows us the way literary criticism works and the insights it gives us into the nature of texts and to a certain extent the original intentions of their authors.
Son of Yahweh: The Gospels As Novels demonstrates clearly the role literary criticism plays in ascertaining the historical value of narrative contents. It is on this point that Owens is in sharp disagreement with many New Testament scholars who seem to assume that literary criticism has little or no value for the historian. Scholars using the gospels as historical sources for the study of Jesus sometimes mistakenly professes little or no need for the insights of literary criticism.
Several posts on Owens’ book appear in the Vridar archive.
I need to update my Who’s Who table. I omitted to include Clarke Owens in the agnostic side of things since it appears he actually has the very same or similar view as I do with respect to the historical Jesus. The question is hardly relevant given that the only Jesus that matters for Christianity is the Christ of faith; historical questions meanwhile should operate quite independently of any à priori assumptions about his identity and role.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!