Biblioblog rankings for February 2010
The following two tabs change content below.
Neil Godfrey
Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.
Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)
- The Folly of Bayesian Probability in “Doing History” - 2024-12-13 05:51:46 GMT+0000
- Jesus Mythicism and Historical Knowledge, Part 4: Did Jesus Exist? - 2024-11-27 08:20:47 GMT+0000
- Jesus Mythicism and Historical Knowledge, Part 3: Prediction and History - 2024-11-24 09:10:07 GMT+0000
If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!
No. I am finding that the rankings are not indicative of quality. They seem to be simply volume. Many people prefer a quality product to just a lot of shit.
Cheers!
RichGriese.NET
Rich,
These rankings are explicitly about volume.
They are about quantity only, but two posters once expressed some interest in accessing the list.
Sometimes my stats have shot up and when I’ve checked to find out why I’ve found that one person has gone into some apparent dementia state and spent a few hours clicking madly around everything on my blog over and over! đ
Lies, damned lies and statistics, as they say. But it’s interesting to see lists of other biblioblogs and see who and what is around, I think.