Skip to content

Vridar

Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science

  • What Is Vridar? (updated 19th December 2016)
  • ABOUT VRIDAR: Authors’ profiles (updated 14th March 2019)

Tag: Tripoli


2011-02-22

Tripoli

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

Filed under: Politics & Society
Tags: Gaddafi, Libya, Tripoli

How irrelevant is all this shite about Paul and the gospels. Continue reading “Tripoli”

Share this:

  • Tweet
  • Email

Like this:

Like Loading...
Author Neil GodfreyPosted on 2011-02-22 06:35:03 GMT+00002019-10-28 14:48:34 GMT+0000Categories Politics & SocietyTags Gaddafi, Libya, Tripoli3 Comments on Tripoli

What they say about Vridar

“I want to say here that this site is so resourceful and highly on top of the most modern scholarship in the areas discussed here. . . I know of no other site which offers a wide range of topics related to careful critical analysis of historically and scripturally related issues.”

— Martin Lewadny, – March 2009

“Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on.”

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019

“I always enjoy reading Neil’s blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest.”

— April DeConick, – November 2007

“Thanks for your very elaborate review! I realized that I hadn’t added your blog to our blogroll. This oversight has been corrected. Looking forward to more segments.”

— Anthony Le Donne, – September 2009

“These reviews of yours are so bloody weird!”

— James Crossley, – April 2010

“Many thanks for this post, and for the quality of your blog.“

— Philippe Wajdenbaum, –  November 2018

“I think you have a high quality blog that provides a positive public service by discussing academic topics within a wider audience.”

— Russell Gmirkin, – October 2016

Note that I do not use the term ‘amateur’ pejoratively. . . . In fact, Godfrey is extremely well read and his librarian skills have brought many important academic works to my attention.

Raphael Lataster – August 2019

“Thanks for this detailed interaction! I’ll try to offer something more substantial than “Thank you” in response at some point, but I didn’t want to wait . . . to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what I’ve written!”

— James McGrath, – June 2009

“For an excellent example of generally high-quality scholarship by someone who isn’t a biblical studies professor, see Neil Godfrey’s work posted on the website vridar.org.”

— Tom Dykstra, – JOCABS 2015

“Neil Godfrey and Tim Widowfield, who both write at Vridar . . . happen to be some of the most astute and well-read amateurs you can read on the internet on the subject of biblical historicity. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they don’t have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. But I have often been impressed with their grasp of logic and analysis of scholarship. I don’t always agree with them, but I respect their work.”

— Richard Carrier, – March 2014

“I’ve even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really don’t know how to take, so thanks, I think, but I’m not sure, Vrider (even though I feel like I need to take a shower now)).”

— Jim West, – September 2010

I find your blog most interesting and appreciate your ongoing effort to keep to the evidence for the issues discussed! 

— Thomas L. Thompson, – April 2020

Neil, this is an excellent summary of Sanders. I am also delighted to see you expose other important studies for your readers.

— Timothy Bagley, – August 2019

“Here I give an admittedly subjective short list, in random order, of useful, high level and regularly updated weblogs on the study of the Old Testament . . . ‘Vridar: Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science’ (http://vridar.org/) by Neil Godfrey”

— Klaas Spronk, – Bibliotheca Orientalis LXXI, 3/4 (2014)

Thanks much for this book review. I think it expands, and contributes to, the effort in honouring Thomas that we with Lukasz originally had in mind with this volume. Best, Emanuel

— Emanuel Pfoh – August 2020

“I’d like to thank you for this very nice representation of what I was trying to show in the book. It’s always gratifying when a reader zeroes in on exactly those aspects I thought were most interesting and most central to my argument. Thank you for this careful and engaged reading of my work – much appreciated!”

— Eva Mroczek, – June 2017

“I have found your website really valuable as an interpretive filter for Biblical scholarship, especially the origins of Christianity and historicity of Jesus issue.  Your clarity of expression, fair comments and personal insights are much valued.  I refer to your site frequently as yet more names and publications pop up requiring an academic critique and helpful recommendations for book purchases.   So, please continue to delve deeply and share this intellectual sustenance with your grateful readers.”

— Mary Booker, – February 2020 (personal email)

“Very good. This post is going straight to the March 2016 Biblical Studies Carnival.”

—N.T. Wrong, – March 2016

“Neil, this is actually rather useful. Good job.”

— R. Joseph Hoffmann, – June 2014

“Neil, for what it is worth it is obvious to me that if you had earlier in life tracked into a graduate program at one of the world’s leading research universities you would be one of the world’s formidable ones. You are doing essentially the same quality now (apart from the philology and languages) except mostly sticking to commenting on others’ work as informed comment/discussion.”

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019

I still wonder at all the material you turn out for Vridar. The more I read your stuff (and I still do, of course), the more I realize how much we all owe you. Your voice is unique.

— Earl Doherty, November 2013 (personal email)

By the way, my thanks to Neil for an ongoing superb job of exposing Jim’s review for what it is: a farcical and none too effective exercise in mythicism assassination, nothing to do with rational, let alone unbiased, scholarship. I’m also happy to see even Jim giving Neil credit where credit is due.

— Earl Doherty, June 2011

“Neil, You’ve done a clean job in your posting on ‘Jesus the Healer’. It reflects well on you. Best, John”

— John Moles, September 2011 (personal email)

Fantastic. I’m so glad you’re helping to spread these ideas!

Nancy Fraser – June 2019 (personal email)

Search Vridar

Categories

Subscribe to Vridar

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Follow Vridar on Facebook

Follow Vridar on Facebook

Vridar.org’s Sister Site

vridar.info

Pages

  • Thank You!
  • ABOUT VRIDAR: Authors’ profiles (updated 14th March 2019)
    • What Is Vridar? (updated 19th December 2016)
    • Contact info
    • Comments and moderation (updated 21st Jan 2018)
    • Permissions: mine and yours
  • WHO’s WHO: Mythicists, Mythicist Agnostics & Historicists Who Call for Scholarly Debate (Updated 6th August 2020)
  • HISTORICAL METHOD and the Question of Christian Origins
  • ARCHIVES by TOPIC, Annotated (Updated 20 May 2020)
    • “Born of a Woman” / Galatians 4:4 INDEX
    • “Rulers of this Age” in 1 Cor. 2:6-8
    • Billionaire Logic and the Death of JFK
    • Christ Among the Messiahs (Novenson)
    • Daniel Gullotta’s Review of Richard Carrier’s On the Historicity of Jesus
    • Death and Resurrection of the Beloved Son (Levenson)
    • Emmaus Road / Cleopas Posts
    • Ending of the Gospel of Mark (16:8) — ANNOTATED INDEX
    • From Adapa to Enoch (Sanders)
    • Genre of Gospels, Acts and OT Primary History: INDEX
    • Historical Methods (with reference to the study of Christian Origins/Historicity of Jesus)
    • Jesus in Josephus: Testimonium Flavianum
    • Nazareth
    • Plato and the Hebrew Bible (Gmirkin)
  • OTHER AUTHORS
    • Earl Doherty’s posts
    • Earl Doherty’s response to Bart Ehrman‘s Did Jesus Exist?
    • Earl Doherty’s response to James McGrath‘s “review” of JNGNM & other criticisms (& misc)
    • Roger Parvus: Letters Supposedly Written by Ignatius
    • Roger Parvus: A Simonian Origin for Christianity
    • Samuel Sandmel’s article, “Parallelomania” (1962)
  • Rationalist-atheist links
  • Response to ADL propaganda, “Major Attacks Against Israel”
    • Palestinian news sources
  • Subscription Page

Recent Comments

  • francois on OT Sources for the Gospel of Mark, chapters 2 and 3: “Reading Mark as a midrash, Chapter 14: The divided house Tags: Midrash, Maurice Mergui, Nanine Charbonnel (Mark 3:21-35) A call…” Feb 24, 09:34
  • Joan Cameron on Techno-Feudalism — We are working for Big Tech for free: “A year or two after I first heard of Facebook, they did something that made me decide to never get…” Feb 24, 03:42
  • Neil Godfrey on Samuel Sandmel’s article, “Parallelomania” (1962): “I can perhaps recall that he may have considered the Torah older than third century BCE. But T’s view of…” Feb 23, 14:00
  • Neil Godfrey on Why Navalny: “Anything “may be possible” but if we are interested in being better informed there are a range of excellent sources…” Feb 23, 12:52
  • Stephen Goranson on Why Navalny: “During my undergraduate days at Brandeis U. (1968-1972), and with a family member at MIT then (one of 3 family…” Feb 23, 12:20
  • Stephen Goranson on Samuel Sandmel’s article, “Parallelomania” (1962): “Though I cannot speak for the late Shemaryahu Talmon, and some of his writings are not at hand today, I…” Feb 23, 12:08
  • Neil Godfrey on Techno-Feudalism — We are working for Big Tech for free: “Oh the irony! This post is not available through Facebook to anyone in Australia (including me). When I try to…” Feb 23, 10:06
  • Giuseppe on John the Baptist Resources: “Greg, do you think that ‘Zebedee’ is a variant of ‘Saphat’? If Jesus calling the disciples is a new Elijah,…” Feb 22, 18:56
  • Neil Godfrey on Samuel Sandmel’s article, “Parallelomania” (1962): “SG, you inform us that, “Parallelomania” is the title of an article by Samuel Sandmel in Journal of Biblical Literature…” Feb 22, 05:05

Recent Posts

  • Techno-Feudalism — We are working for Big Tech for free 2021-02-23 08:43:29 GMT+0000
  • How and Why the Mandaeans Embraced John the Baptist 2021-02-16 11:49:07 GMT+0000
  • The Mystery of the Incarnation Solved? — Continuing the series on Nanine Charbonnel’s Jésus-Christ, Sublime Figure de Papier 2021-02-14 13:58:16 GMT+0000
  • Why Navalny 2021-02-12 00:32:55 GMT+0000
  • What the Left Means by “Systemic” 2021-02-06 23:17:36 GMT+0000
  • Vridar posts delay 2021-01-31 23:49:49 GMT+0000
  • John the Baptist Resources 2021-01-25 11:12:45 GMT+0000
  • Conspiracy theories — true and false and how to tell the difference 2021-01-22 20:55:19 GMT+0000
  • The 1776 Report: History as Political Propaganda 2021-01-21 12:18:47 GMT+0000
  • Armageddon: Another Eric Cline Interview 2021-01-21 04:09:16 GMT+0000
  • The Big Lie: from Germany to Russia to the United States 2021-01-18 23:05:23 GMT+0000
  • Lessons From the 6 January Insurrection 2021-01-18 10:57:23 GMT+0000
  • When, Why and How People Change Their Minds 2021-01-17 01:37:01 GMT+0000
  • Applying Bayesian Reasoning to Trump’s Claims of Election Fraud 2021-01-17 00:49:52 GMT+0000
  • What Is the Purpose of the Nicodemus Stories in John? (Part 2) 2021-01-16 00:35:53 GMT+0000
  • But then it got privatized 2021-01-14 20:33:00 GMT+0000
  • Why was the Gospel Narrative set around 30 CE? 2021-01-11 23:35:46 GMT+0000
  • Really Hoping this Professor is Wrong 2021-01-10 10:31:56 GMT+0000
  • What Is the Purpose of the Nicodemus Stories in John? (Part 1) 2021-01-06 00:18:38 GMT+0000
  • Spit at a Late Date for the Gospel of Mark? 2021-01-05 11:26:47 GMT+0000

Most-Used Tags

  • Acts of the Apostles
  • Ancient historians
  • Australia
  • Bart Ehrman
  • Bauckham: Jesus and the Eyewitnesses
  • Biblical Scholarship
  • Brodie: Beyond the Quest for the Historical Jesus
  • Christianity
  • Christian Origins
  • Christ Myth Debate
  • Christ Myth Debate: Doherty
  • Criteria of Authenticity
  • Doherty: Jesus Neither God Nor Man
  • Earl Doherty
  • Epistles
  • Exchanges with McGrath
  • Fundamentalism
  • God and Other Deities
  • Gospel of John
  • Gospel of Luke
  • Gospel of Mark
  • Gospel of Matthew
  • Gospels
  • Gospels and Acts (Canonical)
  • Historical Jesus
  • Historical Method
  • Intertextuality
  • Islam
  • Israel
  • Israel-Palestine
  • James McGrath
  • Josephus
  • Marcion
  • Maurice Casey
  • Paul
  • Paul and his letters
  • Richard Bauckham
  • Richard Carrier
  • Robert M. Price
  • Roger Parvus
  • Terrorism
  • Thomas Brodie
  • Trump
  • USA
  • Vridar blog

Archives

Calendar

February 2021
S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28  
« Jan    

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
  • What Is Vridar? (updated 19th December 2016)
  • ABOUT VRIDAR: Authors’ profiles (updated 14th March 2019)
Vridar Proudly powered by WordPress
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: