Posted by Michael Commane February this year:

Thomas Brodie deserves to be well and long remembered, not only for his scholarship but also for his personal experiences as a scholar of integrity in a field where faith hangs like a fog over all its practitioners—believers, agnostics, and even the few atheists alike.
Of particular interest to readers here is Michael Commane’s note:
[Thomas Brodie] was the first director of the Dominican Biblical Institute in Limerick, which opened in 2001. Tom remained as director until 2012. The institute closed in 2016.
The Irish Catholic of January 21, 2013 wrote the following about Tom: “This[Tom’s retirement as director] coincided with his publication of Beyond the Quest for the Historical Jesus, in which he claimed Jesus Christ did not exist as an historical person and led the Irish Dominican province to direct him to withdraw from ministry and cease teaching and writing.”
Tom did not accept the findings of the Dominicans. He argued that he was entering into the ongoing debate about the historical person of Christ.
I covered in depth that publication, Beyond the Quest for the Historical Jesus. See
The Brodie Files: Beyond the Quest Posts on Vridar
Published in 1956, Jesus Came Again only quietly explained it was a parable. The only hints were the last paragraph on the back cover and a small-print, dislocated sub-title on the title page. There was nothing on the front cover to alert the reader of the nature of Vardis Fisher’s retelling.
Brodie was never “anti-Christian”. He even argued that a non-historical Jesus made the Christian message potentially more personally meaningful. Compare Mythicism Making Christianity More Meaningful. Beyond the Quest is a phenomenological journey that allows readers to understand why and how he came to see Jesus as a spiritual metaphor with the power to edify the believer — but this could only be accomplished by acknowledging the New Testament’s Jesus was never a historical figure. (Another work I am reminded of, though this one was authored by an atheist: Jesus Came Again; a parable.)
But Brodie’s most in-depth scholarly output was probably his 33 + 653 page tome, in effect a collation of many years of his research and publications: The Birthing of the New Testament: The Intertextual Development of the New Testament Writings.
If you have been intrigued by works (not only by Brodie, but also Winn, MacDonald, Charbonnel and others) identifying the Greco-Roman as well as Old Testament sources of the gospel narratives, you will appreciate The Birthing as a priceless treasure indeed. The same volume contains an overwhelming (in my view) demolition of the need to assume oral traditions lie behind the gospels. Brodie even argues that the “raw emotion” of Paul’s epistle to the Galatians is a literary artifice drawn from the Old Testament.
Vridar posts addressing Thomas Brodie’s work (including this post) are collated here. There are about 50 or so of them.
Remembering Thomas Brodie with fondness and sadness and deep respect, I like to leave my little collection of hard copies of his works:
& jointly edited with Thomas Brodie:
Brodie, Thomas L., Dennis R. MacDonald, and Stanley E. Porter, eds. 2006. The Intertextuality of the Epistles: Explorations of Theory and Practice. Sheffield Phoenix Press.
Leave a Reply
If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!



I’m a secular Christian. My Catholic upbringing made me a Socialist who shares Blake’s view:
“The worship of God is: Honouring his gifts in other men, each according to his genius, and loving the greatest men best: those who envy or calumniate great men hate God, for there is no other God.”
Brodie and Detering are heroes to me.
I personally would consider him the greatest mythicist author of the 21st century. One who truly knew his material, understood the intertextual analysis of the New Testament literature, and whose work I think most astutely laid bare the fictionality of the NT. Even while I don’t agree with his Synoptic problem resolution, or his identification of “Proto-Luke” and whatnot, his intertextual studies should be far more well-known than they are. It is a shame so little attention has been given to this monument of a scholar, whose output was sadly cut short by church censorship. I am seriously hoping something good will be done to memorialize him. There should honestly be some kind of memorial anthology on intertextual studies, or something dedicated to his memory.
Maybe I’m being thick but I can’t work out what a “33 + 653 page” book is.
Apologies…. would xxxiii + 653 page book make a little more sense? — I’ve been badly conditioned from being immersed for years in librarianship and cannot add up book pages for myself but always reproduce the numbering as printed 🙁
One of the few fearless scholars we had. What a legacy!