I have the honour of gaining a mention in two of the biggest biblioblogs in the whole wide internet now. Aw shucks, and they both really do such a thorough job of analyzing my work and studying my personal psychology. I hope I won’t get a bill for their services.
Between “Dr” Jim West and Joel Watts I find I am:
a genuine flinger
a genuine flicker
utterly unacquainted with Crossley’s work
accuse Crossley of playing favorites when it comes to historiographically centered methodological questions (wow, I’m not sure what that means but it sounds like I’ve done something serious or important)
utterly bereft of insight
ramble on about absolutely nothing with such aplomb (irishanglican would no doubt agree with this assessment)
have taken on a stern taskmaster belief system
possibly have a personality defect
appear to be comforting myself in my denial of Jesus’ historicity
absolutely hate my former self
‘need’ Jesus not to be real for my own personal comfort
create conspiracy theories
have refused to acknowledge scholarship that once denied my view of faith
(Baptists? Methodists?and now deny the same scholars who deny my rejection of faith
forget how history is formed
am angry (part of an angry mob to be precise)
profoundly need there to be no god
leap any logical boundary to this end
but what’s really interesting is my motive in all of this — I know that hell and damnation await me if there is a god!
And all of this on the eve of me birthday too! Well, thanks guys, a good belly laugh is the best way to start a new year! 🙂