2022-12-18

Walking Sharks

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

I used to think the lungfish was the halfway species between sea and land animals but I was not aware of the epaulette shark until the possible discovery of a new species of them made the news: Here is a five year old video:

According to the ABC news report they can stay out of water for up to two hours.

I can believe the part where they are said to survive on land by shutting down several of their brain functions. Now that might explain a lot about another, more familiar, two-legged creature that has become a land-dweller!

Bio
Latest Posts

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Updated file - 2023-09-28 07:55:58 GMT+0000
Not All Historians Are Equal - 2023-09-27 03:57:54 GMT+0000
Speaking of translations…. - 2023-09-26 01:15:16 GMT+0000

If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!

2 thoughts on “Walking Sharks”

Keith says:

2022-12-20 04:43:12 GMT+0000 at 04:43

Just recently learned about that shark.
The mudskipper is an incredible walking fish. I feel like I’m looking at life forms similar to what may have existed
hundreds of millions of years ago.

https://youtu.be/CAQuoH_fOWM

Reply
1. Neil Godfrey says:
  
  2022-12-20 22:45:26 GMT+0000 at 22:45
  
  There is some weird and gross stuff out there! More fascinating — a “time travel” back into the environments of the past: https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/latenightlive/otherworlds—prehistoric-places/101761006
  
  Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

"Many thanks for this post, and for the quality of your blog."

— Philippe Wajdenbaum, – November 2018
"Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"I’ve even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really don’t know how to take, so thanks, I think, but I’m not sure, Vrider (even though I feel like I need to take a shower now))."

-- Jim West, – September 2010
"I have found your website really valuable as an interpretive filter for Biblical scholarship, especially the origins of Christianity and historicity of Jesus issue. Your clarity of expression, fair comments and personal insights are much valued. I refer to your site frequently as yet more names and publications pop up requiring an academic critique and helpful recommendations for book purchases. So, please continue to delve deeply and share this intellectual sustenance with your grateful readers."

— Mary Booker, – February 2020 (personal email)
"Very good. This post is going straight to the March 2016 Biblical Studies Carnival."

—N.T. Wrong, – March 2016
https://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=145080#p145080
Neil made a good synthesis of the work without being an “expert” of the field.

-- Enrico Tuccinardi, - October 2022
"Neil, this is actually rather useful. Good job."

— R. Joseph Hoffmann, – June 2014
"Thanks much for this book review. I think it expands, and contributes to, the effort in honouring Thomas that we with Lukasz originally had in mind with this volume. Best, Emanuel"

-- Emanuel Pfoh - August 2020
It is worth saying another word of appreciation here for Neil Godfrey's effort to make Bruno Bauer accessible in English.

-- Peter Kirby, - May 2023
"I always enjoy reading Neil’s blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest."

— April DeConick, – November 2007
"I find your blog most interesting and appreciate your ongoing effort to keep to the evidence for the issues discussed!"

-- Thomas L. Thompson, - April 2020
"I’d like to thank you for this very nice representation of what I was trying to show in the book. It’s always gratifying when a reader zeroes in on exactly those aspects I thought were most interesting and most central to my argument. Thank you for this careful and engaged reading of my work – much appreciated!"

— Eva Mroczek, – June 2017
"Note that I do not use the term ‘amateur’ pejoratively. . . . In fact, Godfrey is extremely well read and his librarian skills have brought many important academic works to my attention."

Raphael Lataster - August 2019
"These reviews of yours are so bloody weird!"

— James Crossley, – April 2010
"For an excellent example of generally high-quality scholarship by someone who isn’t a biblical studies professor, see Neil Godfrey’s work posted on the website vridar.org."

— Tom Dykstra, – JOCABS 2015
This is superb work, Neil, and reminds me of Albert Schweitzer’s work from a century ago. . . . .

I commend you for being the first to even TRY to translate Bruno Bauer’s brilliant Kritik der Evangelien und Geschichte ihres Ursprungs, which is now more than 150 years old.

. . . . .Thank you for your historic effort.

-- Paul Trejo, M.A., - November 2022
Editor, An English Edition of Bruno Bauer’s 1843 Christianity Exposed
Congratulations, Vridar, . . . I declare, Vridar, your own hard work translating Bruno Bauer will make a major difference in future studies of Bruno Bauer and the evolution of Hegel’s philosophy of religion.

-- Paul Trejo, - April 2023
"Neil Godfrey and Tim Widowfield, who both write at Vridar . . . happen to be some of the most astute and well-read amateurs you can read on the internet on the subject of biblical historicity. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they don’t have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. But I have often been impressed with their grasp of logic and analysis of scholarship. I don’t always agree with them, but I respect their work."

— Richard Carrier, – March 2014
"Neil, for what it is worth it is obvious to me that if you had earlier in life tracked into a graduate program at one of the world’s leading research universities you would be one of the world’s formidable ones. You are doing essentially the same quality now (apart from the philology and languages) except mostly sticking to commenting on others’ work as informed comment/discussion."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"Thanks for this detailed interaction! I’ll try to offer something more substantial than 'Thank you' in response at some point, but I didn’t want to wait . . . to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what I’ve written!"

— James McGrath, – June 2009
"Neil, You’ve done a clean job in your posting on ‘Jesus the Healer’. It reflects well on you. Best, John"

— John Moles, September 2011 (personal email)
"Here I give an admittedly subjective short list, in random order, of useful, high level and regularly updated weblogs on the study of the Old Testament . . . ‘Vridar: Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science’ (http://vridar.org/) by Neil Godfrey"

-- Klaas Spronk, - Bibliotheca Orientalis LXXI, 3/4 (2014)
"I still wonder at all the material you turn out for Vridar. The more I read your stuff (and I still do, of course), the more I realize how much we all owe you. Your voice is unique."

— Earl Doherty, November 2013 (personal email)
"Fantastic. I’m so glad you’re helping to spread these ideas!"

Nancy Fraser - June 2019 (personal email)
"I want to say here that this site is so resourceful and highly on top of the most modern scholarship in the areas discussed here. . . I know of no other site which offers a wide range of topics related to careful critical analysis of historically and scripturally related issues."

-- Martin Lewadny, - March 2009
"By the way, my thanks to Neil for an ongoing superb job of exposing Jim’s review for what it is: a farcical and none too effective exercise in mythicism assassination, nothing to do with rational, let alone unbiased, scholarship. I’m also happy to see even Jim giving Neil credit where credit is due."

— Earl Doherty, June 2011
"Thanks for your very elaborate review! I realized that I hadn’t added your blog to our blogroll. This oversight has been corrected. Looking forward to more segments."

— Anthony Le Donne, – September 2009
"I think you have a high quality blog that provides a positive public service by discussing academic topics within a wider audience."

— Russell Gmirkin, – October 2016

Steve Ruis on Not All Historians Are Equal: “Amazing. Religious faith sure seems synthetic, and mostly fictional/imaginary.” Sep 27, 14:56
Kuudere-Kun on Final of “Letters Supposedly Written by Ignatius”: Tackling New Questions: “I’m just sharing my thoughts on the subject.” Sep 26, 23:55
Neil Godfrey on Final of “Letters Supposedly Written by Ignatius”: Tackling New Questions: “I am not the author of the post, but I can comment that it is one thing to speculate about…” Sep 26, 22:49
Kuudere-Kun on Final of “Letters Supposedly Written by Ignatius”: Tackling New Questions: “Since the 19th Century some Protestants have argued the Igatian Letters were forced by Callixtus. I suspect he may at…” Sep 26, 20:43
Neil Godfrey on The shipwrecks of Josephus and Paul (Part 3): “Not at all. They are both by simple definition “literary” accounts because they are literature. Literary accounts can and many…” Sep 26, 09:45
Kuudere-Kun on The shipwrecks of Josephus and Paul (Part 3): “The problem is neither of these are literary accounts, they eyewitness accounts of events that actually transpired. Luke isn’t even…” Sep 26, 08:50
Neil Godfrey on Spit at a Late Date for the Gospel of Mark?: “Hi Giuseppe — I have had another look at Krijbolder and I see it may be an overstatement to say…” Sep 23, 07:50
Giuseppe on Spit at a Late Date for the Gospel of Mark?: “Hi Neil, my post was meant to raise the suspicion that Karel Hanhart, far from giving a work that “is…” Sep 18, 16:29
Kuudere-Kun on Rome Burning – the Christian Problem in the Annals of Tacitus: “This is kind of verified by reading Lactantius’s Of The Manner in Which the Persecutors died. He does believe Nero…” Sep 16, 14:03

Neil Godfrey

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Share this:

Like this:

2 thoughts on “Walking Sharks”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply