What the Left Means by “Systemic”

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Tim Widowfield

At the end of 2020, I began to see the requisite social media posts asking what we’re tired of hearing or seeing in the news, and which words or terms we hope never to hear again. Not surprisingly, several people cited “systemic racism” (or, for that matter, systemic anything).

Throughout the previous year, pundits on the left (i.e., centrist liberals) and the right posted responses to what they see as the overuse of the term systemic racism. Disingenuous conservatives warned that blaming the system for generating racist ideas and exclusionary behavior would tend to absolve individuals for moral failings.

On the surface, they may seem to have a point. If the system causes people to behave the way they do, then how can we blame anyone? You may recognize this sort of argument when, for example, centrists and conservatives reflexively point toward the sin of greed rather than the underlying system that rewards or even requires it. They redirect our attention to failing people so that we don’t look too closely at the failing structure that nurtures and supports them. By focusing our attention on the actions of individuals they hope to prevent meaningful change.

Before continuing, we need to be absolutely clear about what we mean by “systemic.” In the mainstream press, we frequently see references to ideas, policies, and behavior that pervade the system. However, they focus our attention on the people who hold those ideas, promote those policies, and engage in that behavior. And where the right sees only bad actors, centrist liberals see bad actors working in a system that needs to be reformed. Neither view is particularly helpful; however, the notion that the politico-economic framework is a neutral playing field that just needs a fairer rulebook and better referees is comforting, but seriously wrongheaded.

When we on the left say that problems like racism are systemic, we don’t mean to imply that the system is riddled with it. Nor do we mean that the system merely tolerates or encourages it. Nor even do we mean that there is some nebulous symbiotic relationship among bad actors and certain facets of the system. No, we mean to say that they arise from it. The business cycle is a product of capitalism. Monopolies are products of capitalism. And American racism is a product of the American expression of capitalism, which sustains itself by drawing sharp racial, religious, and class distinctions — and by pitting those factions against one another in the struggle to acquire artificially scarce resources.

Careful, left-of-center, “sensible” liberals may use the term systemic racism, but they’re actually referring to institutional racism. While no one can deny that our institutions continue to nourish, maintain, and defend the status quo, we leftists remain skeptical that education and legislation will fix the problem.

We would, naturally, never stand in the way of these piecemeal attempts, since any progress at all is welcome. However, we should, at the same time, keep in mind that the underlying system will keep generating its products the way a cracked die continues to stamp out defective parts. Moreover, as our population changes and we become a minority-majority society, we will see even greater racial tensions. With that in mind, I encourage the continued use of the term systemic racism, in the hopes that it may slowly dawn on people that fundamental problems require a fundamental solution.

[Note: This post does not necessarily represent the opinions of Neil Godfrey.  –Tim]

The following two tabs change content below.

Tim Widowfield

Tim is a retired vagabond who lives with his wife and multiple cats in a 20-year-old motor home. To read more about Tim, see our About page.

If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!

10 thoughts on “What the Left Means by “Systemic””

  1. To me, “systemic racism” includes within it “institutional racism” and further recognizes that past choices made by majority white institutions continue to define present and future opportunities for people of color. The fact that a particular institution has been purged of present-day racism does not mean that its prior actions do not continue to ramify and resonate today. Racism has a half-life measured in decades, not years.

      1. My point was what Morris articulated.

        We are tribal and have bias/prejudice that derives from our evolution, not our economic system.

        Education is the answer.

  2. First, “systemic racism” does exist. It exists in all nations that have a majority population which is supplemented by minorities. It is not an issue exclusive to nations with a majority population of European decent, for example it exists in India between castes. But, is it a product of any of these nations economic systems? I don’t really think so. I think it is a product of the innate human tendency to self associate within groups. If a nation should want to make an attempt at eliminating this, then it seems that education as opposed to the statement above, “we leftists remain skeptical that education and legislation will fix the problem”, would be the best way. Legislation, I agree is probably not very effective.

  3. Some of the comments point to a dichotomy between economic systems and human nature — suggesting that it is human nature rather than an economic system that underlies the racism. But is it right to set the two up as alternative explanations? Is not every system of humans, economic, political, social, religious, is a product of human nature by simple definition?

    But if human nature alone were the cause then would we not expect to find “systemic racism” to be a human universal? Yet it is clearly not. Brown’s list of human universals says that a bias to favouring one’s in-group is one of these, but the in-group does not have to be based on race and it does not have to be a vicious or oppressive bias. Enter capitalism . . . .

    I will break off here to spare readers my extended thoughts about capitalism.

    1. I agree, our economic (political, social, religious) system is a product of human nature. I would offer that “systemic racism” can be found in any economic (political, social, religious) system. Business/trade cycles, monopolies and “systemic racism” all existed before capitalism, and non-capitalistic countries have business/trade cycles, monopolies and “systemic racism”.

      Blaming “systemic racism” on capitalism doesn’t add up to me. I see a world without racism more of a fight for ideas/imagination, quality education, and having good/strong character in leaders/influencers.

      What is the fundamental solution?

    1. Unfortunately your take-down of the “Protestant Work Ethic theory” fails to address any of the arguments of the famous originator of what has been taken to be that theory — Max Weber’s study of Protestantism’s influence on the conditions that facilitated the spread of capitalism. His views have tended to have been oversimplified to mean that Protestantism directly led to capitalism, but that is misinformed. Read his The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from Vridar

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading