We feed your body and take your soul!
Much has happened in the world of archaeology this past year but little of it has been related to themes biblical. Two interesting pages are up for comparison and review. The advertisement that appears on the biblical one is obnoxious. Try not to get distracted (though I won’t help at all by re-posting the offending images here) but then finish up with the page listing some really interesting discoveries of wider relevance and interest.
The boring list of “bible-related” archaeological finds:
Biblical Archaeology’s Top Ten Discoveries of 2014 by Gordon Govier, on Christianity Today.
This includes the tomb of St. Stephen (who almost certainly was a myth) and the theatre where Polycarp was (very likely not) martyred.
No, I lie — there is something there of a little interest after all. Something about Noah’s ark being round like a giant version of one of those bath-tubs. And the animals going in two-by-two even on a Babylonian text. (Add it to your trivia list.) The curator of the tablet wears a beard to suit the part, too.
But this shameless plug on the page smacks your face:
The link takes you to a list of all the things your donation can do: provide clean water, a bible in his language and the good news of Jesus. And don’t forget that by giving to this child you are really giving to God himself so you’ll get a really great reward in heaven.
That sort of “compassion” I can do without.
There’s a similar boring list at Bible History Daily, Top 10 Biblical Archaeology Discoveries in 2014 by Robin Ngo. This one has more interesting graphics for the Noah’s ark story here. And it does not have obnoxious ads telling you how to exploit the sufferings of others or how to get a bigger reward in heaven.
But let’s get real. The most interesting archaeological news for the past year is at Coolest Archaeological Discoveries of 2014.
The biggest one is, of course, the tomb from the era of Alexander the Great. Then there’s the Richard III find, more news from Stonehenge, the glamour and cheese mummy in China, the mummified erection of King Tut in Egypt, and most interesting of all (well, to me anyway) is the indication that homo erectus produced some form of “art” designs half a million years ago.
Okay, maybe declaring such an interest is not saying much about the overall excitement level in my life.
Curiously the papyrus fragment that was the centre of attention with that “Jesus had a wife” business made it in the “coolest” secular list of finds. It somehow was overlooked in the biblical ones.
Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)
- Varieties of Atheism #2 - 2023-05-21 02:18:55 GMT+0000
- Varieties of Atheism - 2023-05-20 07:10:56 GMT+0000
- The Troubled “Quiet” before the Jewish Diaspora’s Revolt against Rome: 116-117 C.E. - 2023-05-10 07:58:29 GMT+0000
If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!
One thought on “Archaelogical Finds 2014 — But Beware Christians Bearing Gifts”
Re Tut, here is more:
Someone in the comments speculates that another possibility is that Min is being represented rather than Osiris.
In the New Kingdom, Min was fused with Amun as Amun-Min and had dark skin and an erect penis.
Min is the son of Osiris and Isis and is shown with an erect penis far more often than Osiris is.
Akhenaten’s original name was Amenhotep IV, so reversion to Amun does sound plausible, but I am no expert.