2014-02-12

Vridar’s Second Resurrection

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Tim Widowfield

We’re back!

Did you miss us?

Our recent downtime was self-inflicted. (I know Watts you’re thinking.) But anyhow, we’re on a new server in the Netherlands now, and so far everything seems to be working fine.

Bio
Latest Posts

Tim Widowfield

Tim is a retired vagabond who lives with his wife and multiple cats in a 20-year-old motor home. To read more about Tim, see our About page.

Latest posts by Tim Widowfield (see all)

Mark: The First Biography of Jesus? (Part 1) - 2021-11-26 18:44:13 GMT+0000
A Wunderkind in the Temple? (Part 2) - 2021-07-04 21:42:24 GMT+0000
A Wunderkind in the Temple? (Part 1) - 2021-06-20 23:41:23 GMT+0000

2 thoughts on “Vridar’s Second Resurrection”

Tim Widowfield says:

2014-02-12 03:30:09 GMT+0000 at 03:30

Testing comments. Marco!

Loading...

Reply
Paul D. says:

2014-02-12 04:20:04 GMT+0000 at 04:20

Polo?

By the way, your RSS feed link is broken.

Loading...

Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

"I’d like to thank you for this very nice representation of what I was trying to show in the book. It’s always gratifying when a reader zeroes in on exactly those aspects I thought were most interesting and most central to my argument. Thank you for this careful and engaged reading of my work – much appreciated!"

— Eva Mroczek, – June 2017
"I still wonder at all the material you turn out for Vridar. The more I read your stuff (and I still do, of course), the more I realize how much we all owe you. Your voice is unique."

— Earl Doherty, November 2013 (personal email)
"I think you have a high quality blog that provides a positive public service by discussing academic topics within a wider audience."

— Russell Gmirkin, – October 2016
"Neil, You’ve done a clean job in your posting on ‘Jesus the Healer’. It reflects well on you. Best, John"

— John Moles, September 2011 (personal email)
"Here I give an admittedly subjective short list, in random order, of useful, high level and regularly updated weblogs on the study of the Old Testament . . . ‘Vridar: Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science’ (http://vridar.org/) by Neil Godfrey"

-- Klaas Spronk, - Bibliotheca Orientalis LXXI, 3/4 (2014)
"I always enjoy reading Neil’s blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest."

— April DeConick, – November 2007
"Neil, for what it is worth it is obvious to me that if you had earlier in life tracked into a graduate program at one of the world’s leading research universities you would be one of the world’s formidable ones. You are doing essentially the same quality now (apart from the philology and languages) except mostly sticking to commenting on others’ work as informed comment/discussion."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"By the way, my thanks to Neil for an ongoing superb job of exposing Jim’s review for what it is: a farcical and none too effective exercise in mythicism assassination, nothing to do with rational, let alone unbiased, scholarship. I’m also happy to see even Jim giving Neil credit where credit is due."

— Earl Doherty, June 2011
"I have found your website really valuable as an interpretive filter for Biblical scholarship, especially the origins of Christianity and historicity of Jesus issue. Your clarity of expression, fair comments and personal insights are much valued. I refer to your site frequently as yet more names and publications pop up requiring an academic critique and helpful recommendations for book purchases. So, please continue to delve deeply and share this intellectual sustenance with your grateful readers."

— Mary Booker, – February 2020 (personal email)
"I find your blog most interesting and appreciate your ongoing effort to keep to the evidence for the issues discussed!"

-- Thomas L. Thompson, - April 2020
"Neil Godfrey and Tim Widowfield, who both write at Vridar . . . happen to be some of the most astute and well-read amateurs you can read on the internet on the subject of biblical historicity. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they don’t have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. But I have often been impressed with their grasp of logic and analysis of scholarship. I don’t always agree with them, but I respect their work."

— Richard Carrier, – March 2014
"Thanks for this detailed interaction! I’ll try to offer something more substantial than 'Thank you' in response at some point, but I didn’t want to wait . . . to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what I’ve written!"

— James McGrath, – June 2009
"These reviews of yours are so bloody weird!"

— James Crossley, – April 2010
"Fantastic. I’m so glad you’re helping to spread these ideas!"

Nancy Fraser - June 2019 (personal email)
"Thanks for your very elaborate review! I realized that I hadn’t added your blog to our blogroll. This oversight has been corrected. Looking forward to more segments."

— Anthony Le Donne, – September 2009
"I’ve even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really don’t know how to take, so thanks, I think, but I’m not sure, Vrider (even though I feel like I need to take a shower now))."

-- Jim West, – September 2010
"For an excellent example of generally high-quality scholarship by someone who isn’t a biblical studies professor, see Neil Godfrey’s work posted on the website vridar.org."

— Tom Dykstra, – JOCABS 2015
"Thanks much for this book review. I think it expands, and contributes to, the effort in honouring Thomas that we with Lukasz originally had in mind with this volume. Best, Emanuel"

-- Emanuel Pfoh - August 2020
"Note that I do not use the term ‘amateur’ pejoratively. . . . In fact, Godfrey is extremely well read and his librarian skills have brought many important academic works to my attention."

Raphael Lataster - August 2019
"Neil, this is actually rather useful. Good job."

— R. Joseph Hoffmann, – June 2014
"I want to say here that this site is so resourceful and highly on top of the most modern scholarship in the areas discussed here. . . I know of no other site which offers a wide range of topics related to careful critical analysis of historically and scripturally related issues."

-- Martin Lewadny, - March 2009
"Very good. This post is going straight to the March 2016 Biblical Studies Carnival."

—N.T. Wrong, – March 2016
"Many thanks for this post, and for the quality of your blog."

— Philippe Wajdenbaum, – November 2018

Hearst on Mark: The First Biography of Jesus? (Part 1): “If you enjoy epic long jumping when attempting to arrive at conclusions this is the book for you: https://paintingfakes.blogspot.com/2011/09/more-lives-of-jesus-1-real-messiah.html” Nov 30, 02:46
Mark Topliss on How the Holy Spirit Replaced Jerusalem in a Power Game: “What did ‘the followers of Mark’ Marqionai [Marcionites] have to do with Marcus Julius Agrippa and/or the Samaritan figure known…” Nov 29, 08:14
Mark Topliss on “The war of 70 is not a major issue” in the Gospels?: “I have heard it said that sometimes real life can be stranger than fiction. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_Jesus – https://www.geni.com/projects/Jesus-of-Nazareth-Speculative-Genealogy/28076 I favor the…” Nov 28, 22:26
A Buddhist on “The war of 70 is not a major issue” in the Gospels?: “Although Anna Anderson really was crazy, the false Dmitries, as far as I am aware, were sane scammers. That having…” Nov 28, 13:01
Giuseppe on “The war of 70 is not a major issue” in the Gospels?: “If of interest, Georgios Sidirountios’s thesis about the Zealot Early Christianity is available here. He does interesting points about the…” Nov 28, 09:06
Mark Topliss on “The war of 70 is not a major issue” in the Gospels?: “Jesus is like an Anna Anderson claiming to be Grand Duchess Anastasia or one of the False Dmitry pretenders who…” Nov 28, 04:34
A Buddhist on “The war of 70 is not a major issue” in the Gospels?: “So, to draw a parallel with Japanese Pure Land Buddhism, you would regard Jesus as being more of a leader…” Nov 27, 22:37
Russell Gmirkin on “The war of 70 is not a major issue” in the Gospels?: “I would view Jesus as “teacher” to mean someone bringing wisdom, enlightenment, and ethical truths on a theoretical level. It…” Nov 27, 22:16
Giuseppe on “The war of 70 is not a major issue” in the Gospels?: “Hi Russell, why do you write : The idea that Jesus was a teacher is a late idea peculiar to…” Nov 27, 15:54

Recent Posts

Mark: The First Biography of Jesus? (Part 1) 2021-11-26 18:44:13 GMT+0000

How the Holy Spirit Replaced Jerusalem in a Power Game 2021-11-05 07:56:55 GMT+0000

“The war of 70 is not a major issue” in the Gospels? 2021-10-31 11:10:13 GMT+0000

Indigenous India-Australia Ties 2021-10-28 10:00:10 GMT+0000

Update on Julian Assange 2021-10-27 07:07:18 GMT+0000

Sad farewell to a pioneering colleague 2021-10-25 08:00:39 GMT+0000

When a Priest Loses His Faith 2021-10-17 17:58:04 GMT+0000

A Few Memories from the visiting Met 2021-10-15 14:56:24 GMT+0000

Finding Jesus in (or through) Josephus 2021-10-13 08:22:19 GMT+0000

Mary, Mary, who are you? – part 2 2021-10-11 13:09:37 GMT+0000

Miriam stood afar off 2021-10-09 23:48:38 GMT+0000

Mary, Mary, where did you come from? 2021-10-08 22:07:44 GMT+0000

Mary, Mary, who are you? – part 1 2021-10-07 10:31:41 GMT+0000

Be Optimistic — Or Doomed 2021-10-05 10:58:36 GMT+0000

Reading the Gospel of Mark as Midrash 2021-10-04 07:49:36 GMT+0000

Why We Stopped Flogging 2021-10-01 22:51:46 GMT+0000

Once more on Nazareth, Relevance and Salm versus Carrier 2021-10-01 21:01:48 GMT+0000

Still the Same after 162 years: Our attitude towards other races looking to us for refuge 2021-09-30 10:01:45 GMT+0000

Is the Nazareth Question Important? A Response to Richard Carrier 2021-09-29 14:28:37 GMT+0000

New Page added to the blog 2021-09-28 05:52:00 GMT+0000

Most-Used Tags

Acts of the Apostles

Australia

Bart Ehrman

Bauckham: Jesus and the Eyewitnesses

Biblical Scholarship

Charbonnel: Jesus Christ sublime figure de papier

Christianity

Christian Origins

Christ Myth Debate

Christ Myth Debate: Doherty

Criteria of Authenticity

Doherty: Jesus Neither God Nor Man

Earl Doherty

Epistles

Exchanges with McGrath

Fundamentalism

God and Other Deities

Gospel of John

Gospel of Luke

Gospel of Mark

Gospel of Matthew

Gospels

Gospels and Acts (Canonical)

Historical Jesus

Historical Method

Intertextuality

Islam

Israel-Palestine

James McGrath

John the Baptist

Josephus

Marcion

Maurice Casey

Midrash

Paul

Paul and his letters

Richard Bauckham

Richard Carrier

Robert M. Price

Roger Parvus

Terrorism

Thomas Brodie

Trump

USA

Vridar blog

Archives
Archives
Calendar
February 2014

S M T W T F S

1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

9 10 11 12 13 14 15

16 17 18 19 20 21 22

23 24 25 26 27 28

« Jan Mar »
Meta

Log in

Entries feed

Comments feed

WordPress.org

2014-02-12

Vridar’s Second Resurrection

by Tim Widowfield

We’re back!

Tim Widowfield

Latest posts by Tim Widowfield (see all)

Like this:

Related Posts on Vridar

2 thoughts on “Vridar’s Second Resurrection”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

We’re back!

Tim Widowfield

Latest posts by Tim Widowfield (see all)

Share this:

Like this:

Related Posts on Vridar

2 thoughts on “Vridar’s Second Resurrection”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply