Looking forward to catching up with some discussions that have been under way here in a couple of days when I stop traveling (again).
What they say about Vridar
“Many thanks for this post, and for the quality of your blog.”
“I’d like to thank you for this very nice representation of what I was trying to show in the book. It’s always gratifying when a reader zeroes in on exactly those aspects I thought were most interesting and most central to my argument. Thank you for this careful and engaged reading of my work – much appreciated!”
— Eva Mroczek, – June 2017
“Neil, this is actually rather useful. Good job.”
“These reviews of yours are so bloody weird!”
— James Crossley, – April 2010
“I think you have a high quality blog that provides a positive public service by discussing academic topics within a wider audience.”
“Neil, You’ve done a clean job in your posting on ‘Jesus the Healer’. It reflects well on you. Best, John”
— John Moles, September 2011 (personal email)
“For an excellent example of generally high-quality scholarship by someone who isn’t a biblical studies professor, see Neil Godfrey’s work posted on the website vridar.org.”
— Tom Dykstra, – JOCABS 2015
“Thanks for this detailed interaction! I’ll try to offer something more substantial than “Thank you” in response at some point, but I didn’t want to wait . . . to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what I’ve written!”
— James McGrath, – June 2009
“Very good. This post is going straight to the March 2016 Biblical Studies Carnival.”
—N.T. Wrong, – March 2016
“I always enjoy reading Neil’s blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest.”
“Neil Godfrey and Tim Widowfield, who both write at Vridar . . . happen to be some of the most astute and well-read amateurs you can read on the internet on the subject of biblical historicity. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they don’t have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. But I have often been impressed with their grasp of logic and analysis of scholarship. I don’t always agree with them, but I respect their work.”
“Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on.”
“Thanks for your very elaborate review! I realized that I hadn’t added your blog to our blogroll. This oversight has been corrected. Looking forward to more segments.”
I’ve even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really don’t know how to take, so thanks, I think, but I’m not sure, Vrider (even though I feel like I need to take a shower now)). — Jim West, – Sept. 2010
Search Vridar
Categories
Subscribe to Vridar
Pages
- ABOUT VRIDAR: Authors’ profiles (updated 19th December 2016)
- WHO’s WHO: Mythicists and Mythicist Agnostics (Updated 18 December 2018)
- HISTORICAL METHOD and the Question of Christian Origins
- ARCHIVES by TOPIC, Annotated (Updated 18 Dec 2018)
- “Rulers of this Age” in 1 Cor. 2:6-8
- Billionaire Logic and the Death of JFK
- Daniel Gullotta’s Review of Richard Carrier’s On the Historicity of Jesus
- Emmaus Road / Cleopas Posts
- Ending of the Gospel of Mark (16:8) — ANNOTATED INDEX
- Genre of Gospels, Acts and OT Primary History: INDEX
- Historical Methods (with reference to the study of Christian Origins/Historicity of Jesus)
- Jesus in Josephus: Testimonium Flavianum
- The “Born of a Woman” / Galatians 4:4 INDEX
- OTHER AUTHORS
- Rationalist-atheist links
- Response to ADL propaganda, “Major Attacks Against Israel”
- Subscription Page
Recent Comments
Klaus Schilling on The origin and meaning of the Emmaus Road narrative in Luke: “The story of Emmaus demonstrates the origin of the Christian eucharist in the antinomianist reading of the tale of the…” Feb 20, 11:10
Dennis James Sutherland on The origin and meaning of the Emmaus Road narrative in Luke: “The Psychology of the Emmaus Story. As I gave the Emmaus story some thought as to its construction,…” Feb 20, 00:08
db on Ancient Historiography and Historians — Vridar Posts: “Are there any posts, per the thirty-year dark age in the history of the church (from the 60s to the…” Feb 19, 18:04
Klaus Schilling on R.I.P. F.F.Bruce on Suetonius and Chrestus — revised: “Marcionites wrote "Chrestos", as found in an inscription on a marcionite synagogal site after Diocletian's time, in order to dissociate…” Feb 18, 22:29
Klaus Schilling on R.I.P. F.F.Bruce on Suetonius and Chrestus — revised: “No, Acts is a patchwork of dogmatic fiction from second century which attempts to fool mankind into believing into first-century…” Feb 18, 21:09
Klaus Schilling on It works for Esther. Why not for Jesus?: “Esther and Mordecai are of course Chaldean deities Ishtari and Marduk.” Feb 18, 15:06
Pofarmer on Trump Movement as a Cult / 2: “http://nautil.us/issue/69/patterns/why-misinformation-is-about-who-you-trust-not-what-you-think I thought this article might be of interest, here is a quote. "In fact, there are cases…” Feb 17, 21:11
db on A Response to Dr Sarah, Geeky Humanist, on the Jesus Question: “• Dr Sarah′s review of R. G. Price′s work "Deciphering the Gospels Proves Jesus Never Existed review: Preface and…” Feb 17, 19:50
Klaus Schilling on O’Neill-Fitzgerald: #5, Should We Expect Any Roman Records About Failed Messiahs?: “Those are post-marcionite forgeries and interpolations into prior texts. They are in absolutely no way reprersentative of any "Paul", regardless…” Feb 17, 16:27
Recent Posts
- Ancient Historiography and Historians — Vridar Posts 2019-02-16 21:59:39 UTC
- The Truth About Islam and Democracy 2019-02-16 02:53:55 UTC
- Trump Movement as a Cult / 2 2019-02-15 19:20:10 UTC
- Can Historians Develop a Valid “Feel” for a Reliable Source? 2019-02-14 12:10:50 UTC
- Towards Understanding the Trump Movement as a Cult 2019-02-13 08:53:40 UTC
- Searching for Facts Beneath the Propaganda: Syria 2019-02-11 19:41:26 UTC
- Historians on the Most Basic Laws of Historical Evidence 2019-02-10 22:01:52 UTC
- Vridar Maintenance 2019-02-10 08:19:51 UTC
- The Problem of the Reconstruction of the Life, Deeds, Words of Jesus 2019-02-09 23:58:07 UTC
- Imagine No Interpolations 2019-02-08 13:40:42 UTC
- From Adapa to Jesus 2019-02-07 21:39:00 UTC
- Australia’s Refugee policies: (1) women without male escorts; (2) male sports stars 2019-02-06 11:53:48 UTC
- Common Sense — Then and Now? 2019-02-05 11:33:04 UTC
- Tragic Reminder of Christianity’s Power to Alienate and Crush Life 2019-02-04 20:24:28 UTC
- Hermann Detering – Future of his work? 2019-02-04 10:56:23 UTC
- Luke-Acts as form of history-writing (Luke-Acts Explained . . . Part 2) 2019-02-03 13:47:41 UTC
- Luke-Acts Explained as a form of “Ideal Jewish History” (Part 1) 2019-02-02 09:21:47 UTC
- Remembering 2019-02-01 09:13:31 UTC
- Very sad news 2019-02-01 01:05:17 UTC
- What Is a Historical Fact? – How Historians Decide 2019-01-31 22:33:00 UTC
Archives
Most-Used Tags
Ancient historians Bart Ehrman Bauckham: Jesus and the Eyewitnesses Bible Biblical Scholarship Brodie: Beyond the Quest for the Historical Jesus Carrier: On the Historicity of Jesus Christianity Christian Origins Christ Myth Hypothesis Deconversion Doherty: Jesus God nor Man Earl Doherty Evolution Fundamentalism Genre of the Gospels Gmirkin: Plato and Creation of Hebrew Bible Gospel of John Gospel of Luke Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew Gospels Historical Jesus Historical Method Historicity of Jesus Islam Israel James McGrath Jesus John the Baptist Josephus Luke-Acts Marcion Maurice Casey New Testament Oral Tradition Paul and his letters Richard Bauckham Richard Carrier Robert M. Price Second Temple messianism Social Memory Terrorism Thomas Brodie Vridar blog