This is what biblical studies should look like

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

This is what biblical studies should look like – pushing, prodding, challenging, and thoughtful. I have mentioned before that academics tend to defend, but scholars almost always attack; this is yet another example of this law (let’s call it the Law of Scholarly Aggressiveness) in effect.

That’s from Mike Duncan’s blogpost on his thoughts after reading Robert Price’s The Amazing Colossal Apostle. (I have added Duncan to our Who’s Who list after being alerted to him and his views on Jesus mythicism by James McGrath.)

On Price himself Duncan has this to say:

It is always a pleasure to read a book by a real scholar. Price is often dismissed as a fringe figure, but to me he has that special combination of feisty aggressiveness and being well-read that marks someone that demands to be reckoned with. It is no longer fashionable to take Baur or van Manen seriously, but Price does, and it is refreshing to see a lengthy analysis of the Pauline corpus that refuses to yet again reinforce the middle of the road.


Related Posts on Vridar

The Historical Jesus and the Demise of History, 3b... This continues the previous post on Jesus: An Historian's Review of the Gospels by Michael Grant. Why two posts on this? Since some New Testament scho...
What concord hath Christ with Inquiry? I suppose a professional writer has to select a topic and style that is going to attract readers and an editor is paid to lure those readers with alar...
How Historians Do History — Vridar Posts and... I have begun to sift through my many, many posts on historical methodology with special reference to its application to the question of Christian orig...
Postscript to my Constructive Exchange post Thanks to comment left by db on that post I was alerted to a perspective on the historical Jesus expressed by Jesus Seminar pioneer Robert Funk: Why ...
The following two tabs change content below.

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

One comment

  • Blood
    2018-04-29 14:11:56 GMT+0000 - 14:11 | Permalink

    I would not draw a distinction between academics or scholars, which sets up a false dichotomy. The major difference in Biblical studies is between those who agree to “belief statements” and allow the institution’s theology to direct their research, and those who work in institutions with no such requirements. The latter are not skeptical enough, but the former are not skeptical at all, and it is this faction which forms the majority of the “consensus” that gets trotted out so often. The main purpose of most Biblical research is to defend the Bible and all the institutions that take their authority from it.

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.