The best explanation I have read for the meaning of the story of the 2 trees in the Garden of Eden came from Thompson’s The Mythic Past.
The Genesis story warns that wisdom will make Adam and Eve like gods and then they will die.
They eat of wisdom, and the wisdom they learn is that they are naked. That is what their wisdom is: knowledge of their nakedness. Sounds pretty dumb. How can that be called being made “wise”?
But the story continues. Adam and Eve have become as gods (elohim) or God — God himself said this, Gen.3:22 — and then are sentenced to death.
All their wisdom does for them is to cause them to see they are naked, and then die.
The story does not quite flow. This has opened it up for later generations imputing their own pet speculations of what exactly is the meaning of the fruit, etc.
But Thompson reminds us that Wisdom literature tells the same story. Solomon or the Preacher pursues wisdom in vain, only to learn he knows nothing, is naked, and will die. True wisdom is the fear of God.
Biblical literature pushes the fear of God as the only true wisdom. Humanity, like gods, pursuing wisdom can only end in vanity, nothing, death.
Now that to me makes the story coherent. If it is read as a metaphor of the most basic lesson pushed by the bible’s Wisdom literature then there is no mystery or disconnects. By Adam and Eve pursuing wisdom they do see that they are (metaphorically) naked and all is vanity just as “Solomon” did.
Yep, this implies Genesis is a sophisticated story from the same literary culture that produced Ecclesiastes et al.
Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)
- Varieties of Atheism #2 - 2023-05-21 02:18:55 GMT+0000
- Varieties of Atheism - 2023-05-20 07:10:56 GMT+0000
- The Troubled “Quiet” before the Jewish Diaspora’s Revolt against Rome: 116-117 C.E. - 2023-05-10 07:58:29 GMT+0000
If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!