2007-10-09

Leaderless Jihad

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

Another MHR (“most highly recommended”) Podcast of a Late Night Live (LNL) program on ABC Radio National (only available online another few weeks).

Dr Marc Sageman, an expert on terrorism and counter-terrorism, uses historical analogies to argue that Islamic jihadism does have a limited shelf life. He believes that the zeal of jihadism is self-terminating and that eventually its followers will reject violence as a means of expressing discontent. Given this scenario, do we have our counter-terrorism strategy right? — blurb on the LNL Leaderless Jihad program website.

Additional links to Marc Sageman’s works:

Foreign Policy Research Institute site: Understanding Terror Networks by Marc Sageman

University of Pennsylvania Press site blurb: Understanding Terror Networks, Marc Sageman

Statement of Marc Sageman to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States

Common Myths About Al-Qaida Terrorism

Marc Sageman on the global Salafi jihad

The Journal of International Security Affairs: The Normality of Global Jihadi Terrorism by Marc Sageman

Bio
Latest Posts

Neil Godfrey

Neil is the author of this post. To read more about Neil, see our About page.

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Seeking a Plausible Origin for the Seducing Serpent in the Garden of Eden - 2024-09-17 06:40:27 GMT+0000
Meet the Prophets of Israel’s Predecessors - 2024-09-12 05:59:47 GMT+0000
Christian Origins: Let’s Not Discount the Indian Connection - 2024-09-10 08:56:33 GMT+0000

If you enjoyed this post, please consider donating to Vridar. Thanks!

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

"Thanks for this detailed interaction! I’ll try to offer something more substantial than 'Thank you' in response at some point, but I didn’t want to wait . . . to express appreciation for your detailed interaction with what I’ve written!"

— James McGrath, – June 2009
"I have found your website really valuable as an interpretive filter for Biblical scholarship, especially the origins of Christianity and historicity of Jesus issue. Your clarity of expression, fair comments and personal insights are much valued. I refer to your site frequently as yet more names and publications pop up requiring an academic critique and helpful recommendations for book purchases. So, please continue to delve deeply and share this intellectual sustenance with your grateful readers."

— Mary Booker, – February 2020 (personal email)
"Note that I do not use the term ‘amateur’ pejoratively. . . . In fact, Godfrey is extremely well read and his librarian skills have brought many important academic works to my attention."

Raphael Lataster - August 2019
"I’d like to thank you for this very nice representation of what I was trying to show in the book. It’s always gratifying when a reader zeroes in on exactly those aspects I thought were most interesting and most central to my argument. Thank you for this careful and engaged reading of my work – much appreciated!"

— Eva Mroczek, – June 2017
"Neil, You’ve done a clean job in your posting on ‘Jesus the Healer’. It reflects well on you. Best, John"

— John Moles, September 2011 (personal email)
"Thanks for your very elaborate review! I realized that I hadn’t added your blog to our blogroll. This oversight has been corrected. Looking forward to more segments."

— Anthony Le Donne, – September 2009
"By the way, my thanks to Neil for an ongoing superb job of exposing Jim’s review for what it is: a farcical and none too effective exercise in mythicism assassination, nothing to do with rational, let alone unbiased, scholarship. I’m also happy to see even Jim giving Neil credit where credit is due."

— Earl Doherty, June 2011
It is worth saying another word of appreciation here for Neil Godfrey's effort to make Bruno Bauer accessible in English.

-- Peter Kirby, - May 2023
"For an excellent example of generally high-quality scholarship by someone who isn’t a biblical studies professor, see Neil Godfrey’s work posted on the website vridar.org."

— Tom Dykstra, – JOCABS 2015
"Neil Godfrey and Tim Widowfield, who both write at Vridar . . . happen to be some of the most astute and well-read amateurs you can read on the internet on the subject of biblical historicity. I call them amateurs only for the reason that they don’t have, so far as I know, advanced degrees in the subject. But I have often been impressed with their grasp of logic and analysis of scholarship. I don’t always agree with them, but I respect their work."

— Richard Carrier, – March 2014
"Vridar is consistently thought-provoking, well-informed, and asking the right questions. There are intelligent, thoughtful comments and commenters regularly offering productive discussion. Books and publications are covered with a range of perspectives with attempts at fair and accurate representation of others’ arguments and content (where there are occasional and inevitable missteps on that I notice Neil making corrections and apologies where warranted, which wins points with me). Please carry on."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
Congratulations, Vridar, . . . I declare, Vridar, your own hard work translating Bruno Bauer will make a major difference in future studies of Bruno Bauer and the evolution of Hegel’s philosophy of religion.

-- Paul Trejo, - April 2023
"I think you have a high quality blog that provides a positive public service by discussing academic topics within a wider audience."

— Russell Gmirkin, – October 2016
"I’ve even been cited by atheists with approval (which I really don’t know how to take, so thanks, I think, but I’m not sure, Vrider (even though I feel like I need to take a shower now))."

-- Jim West, – September 2010
"Fantastic. I’m so glad you’re helping to spread these ideas!"

Nancy Fraser - June 2019 (personal email)
https://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=145080#p145080
Neil made a good synthesis of the work without being an “expert” of the field.

-- Enrico Tuccinardi, - October 2022
"Thanks much for this book review. I think it expands, and contributes to, the effort in honouring Thomas that we with Lukasz originally had in mind with this volume. Best, Emanuel"

-- Emanuel Pfoh - August 2020
"I still wonder at all the material you turn out for Vridar. The more I read your stuff (and I still do, of course), the more I realize how much we all owe you. Your voice is unique."

— Earl Doherty, November 2013 (personal email)
"I find your blog most interesting and appreciate your ongoing effort to keep to the evidence for the issues discussed!"

-- Thomas L. Thompson, - April 2020
"Here I give an admittedly subjective short list, in random order, of useful, high level and regularly updated weblogs on the study of the Old Testament . . . ‘Vridar: Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science’ (http://vridar.org/) by Neil Godfrey"

-- Klaas Spronk, - Bibliotheca Orientalis LXXI, 3/4 (2014)
"Very good. This post is going straight to the March 2016 Biblical Studies Carnival."

—N.T. Wrong, – March 2016
This is superb work, Neil, and reminds me of Albert Schweitzer’s work from a century ago. . . . .

I commend you for being the first to even TRY to translate Bruno Bauer’s brilliant Kritik der Evangelien und Geschichte ihres Ursprungs, which is now more than 150 years old.

. . . . .Thank you for your historic effort.

-- Paul Trejo, M.A., - November 2022
Editor, An English Edition of Bruno Bauer’s 1843 Christianity Exposed
"I want to say here that this site is so resourceful and highly on top of the most modern scholarship in the areas discussed here. . . I know of no other site which offers a wide range of topics related to careful critical analysis of historically and scripturally related issues."

-- Martin Lewadny, - March 2009
"These reviews of yours are so bloody weird!"

— James Crossley, – April 2010
"Neil, this is actually rather useful. Good job."

— R. Joseph Hoffmann, – June 2014
"Many thanks for this post, and for the quality of your blog."

— Philippe Wajdenbaum, – November 2018
"Neil, for what it is worth it is obvious to me that if you had earlier in life tracked into a graduate program at one of the world’s leading research universities you would be one of the world’s formidable ones. You are doing essentially the same quality now (apart from the philology and languages) except mostly sticking to commenting on others’ work as informed comment/discussion."

— Gregory Doudna, – January 2019
"I always enjoy reading Neil’s blog because I think that he is careful, thorough, intellectually fair, and honest."

— April DeConick, – November 2007

Neil Godfrey on Seeking a Plausible Origin for the Seducing Serpent in the Garden of Eden: “Garbini is working with the view that there was a rift between Jehud/Judea and the Samaritans from the late Persian/early…” Sep 18, 01:56
Giovanni Bissoli on Seeking a Plausible Origin for the Seducing Serpent in the Garden of Eden: “Cfr. Garbini, Giovanni, Scrivere la storia di Israele, pgg. 247ff., from “… che ebbero in Alcimo il loro rappresentante…”.” Sep 17, 22:59
Neil Godfrey on Seeking a Plausible Origin for the Seducing Serpent in the Garden of Eden: “Actually there is a better case for reading Moses’ staff turning to a crocodile rather than snake. The word used…” Sep 17, 20:59
Neil Godfrey on Seeking a Plausible Origin for the Seducing Serpent in the Garden of Eden: “I really don’t know off hand the answer to your specific question. I’d have to take some time to study…” Sep 17, 20:10
Neil Godfrey on Seeking a Plausible Origin for the Seducing Serpent in the Garden of Eden: “One possible answer in the affirmative (that the serpent was only a “tempter” and not a liar or deceiver) may…” Sep 17, 20:00
Steve Ruis on Seeking a Plausible Origin for the Seducing Serpent in the Garden of Eden: “Re “The image of the serpent as a religious icon had been familiar enough in the Levant for millennia. .…” Sep 17, 15:03
Paul Trejo on Seeking a Plausible Origin for the Seducing Serpent in the Garden of Eden: “Interesting comparison of Socrates to the wily serpent, especially by his enemies. On the snake, however, I’m reminded of Hegel’s…” Sep 17, 14:14
Russell Gmirkin on Seeking a Plausible Origin for the Seducing Serpent in the Garden of Eden: ““If we ride with the possibility of a Hellenistic origin for the biblical literature, we may see in the serpent’s…” Sep 17, 09:49
Neil Godfrey on Seeking a Plausible Origin for the Seducing Serpent in the Garden of Eden: “It is thus possible that Genesis 3 sides with humanity and with the serpent [Prometheus] against Yahweh [Zeus], as in…” Sep 17, 09:44

Neil Godfrey

Latest posts by Neil Godfrey (see all)

Share this:

Like this:

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Discover more from Vridar