2016-06-02

Islam DE-radicalized him!

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

by Neil Godfrey

Screen Shot 2016-06-02 at 9.01.05 pmDo not comment on this post unless you are prepared to stay to engage with possible alternative views and defend your own ideas in civil discourse. Angry and fly-by-nighter comments may be deleted.

Studying Islam DE-radicalized him!? His deepening knowledge and understanding of Islam from the scholars turned him away from support for ISIS.

I don’t know if readers outside Australia will be able to access the video on this page but at least there is a partial transcript: Australian radical explains why he once supported IS – and why he stopped.

The TV doco is a look at a de-radicalization program in Australia (with comparisons with the Netherlands, iirc). The experts interviewed say the same things as the experts who have written the books I have posted about several times now:

  • young people do not join terrorist groups because of beliefs but for adventure, status, belonging, meaningful life. . . .
  • the deep beliefs usually follow their joining
  • targeting whole communities of Muslims is counterproductive; it misses the most relevant targets in the community and actually isolates them more, making them more vulnerable to radicalization.
    • and telling people that if they are not happy in this country they should go back to where they came from is the worst thing one can do: it makes the young person feel even more alienated and susceptible to radicalization.

There are questions left hanging, however. Though certain individuals are deradicalized through a deepening study of Islam they appear to maintain a strong Islamist belief system. Only an Islamism that is opposed to violence. That’s good, at least the part about being opposed to violence is good.

But if they still fail to truly appreciate and subscribe to Enlightenment values, democracy as it is understood in the Western tradition, pluralism and the value of secularism to lubricate a happily functioning society — then are we feeding another social problem that will need to be confronted in the future?

 

 

 

2 Comments

  • Paxton Marshall
    2016-06-03 01:44:57 UTC - 01:44 | Permalink

    People have always interpreted their religion to support what they want to do for other reasons. There’s enough contradiction in all religions to allow people to emphasize what fits their agenda and ignore what doesn’t.

    Islamic radicalism is primarily a response to western imperialism. Our “enlightenment values” have not prevented us from exploiting and oppressing others. Until we apply the same standards to ourselves that we apply to others, we are not justified in calling ourselves “enlightened”. Those who bewail the murder of dozens in Europe, and ignore the slaughter of tens of thousands in Iraq and Gaza, are not enlightened; they are hypocrites.

  • 2016-06-04 21:45:25 UTC - 21:45 | Permalink

    Ideologies are constantly evolving. Islam is certainly a multitude of ideologies. Violent ideas are on the edge of many ideologies, but the edges can turn into centers under the right conditions. I am still enough of a Marxist to believe that it is the extreme wealth for an elite and debilitating poverty for ever increasing masses that has driven violence into the center of Islam over the past 50 years in many places. If these conditions change, ,many Islamic ideologies will shift the violence to the outer edges again.

  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *